<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Cubs Pound Astros</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php</link>
<description>All comments for Cubs Pound Astros</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>mattz</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429956</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429956</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:59:04 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@Marcus

I&apos;ve become jaded in general to the rampant Cubs converge in Chicago media in general and took the opportunity to play into the White Sox inferiority complex (&quot;We are Chicago&apos;s Bitch&quot;).   At least this time the Cubs did something worth writing about (they are on quite a roll) so nothing against the Chicagoist.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mike_thoms</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429504</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429504</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:25:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;did Chicagoist finally hire a sports reporter that doesn&apos;t blindly hate the Cubs?  I&apos;d settle for that, he or she doesn&apos;t have to even be a Cubs, it would just be nice to read a post about the Cubs minus the jealous vitriol &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Marcus Gilmer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429391</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429391</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:08:26 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Emme, only if it&apos;s during the day and I&apos;m sober. Which, admittedly, is rare.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>emme</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429365</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429365</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:39:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Marcus, can we expect a recap of every game where the Cubs beat a sub-.500 team?  Just wondering.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Marcus Gilmer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429332</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429332</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:58:19 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Mattz - you&apos;re kidding, right? I mean, yeah, we&apos;ve done more Cubs stories than usual this week with the sale and night games fiasco, but there are a dominant number of Sox fans on the staff who love to drink the haterade on the Cubs *coughBenji&amp;Chuckcough*&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mattz</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429325</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/08/06/cubs_pound_astros.php#comment-1429325</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:52:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Whole lot of Cub love around here, but no mention of the Sox come from behind (twice) win in extra innings last night?...I see how it is....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>