Man Charged with Throwing Kitten

Wayne Evans, of the 3700 block of West Dickens, was charged with aggravated cruelty to an animal today. Witnesses told police they saw Evans hold a kitten by the back of its neck and throw it off a second-story porch. "Police found the kitten, which is about 8 weeks old, lying in the street bleeding from the mouth and unable to move its hind legs." Evans apparently said he threw the cat because it scratched him. [WBBM]

Email This Entry


Comments (13) [rss]

In a sane world, he goes to prison, is chemically castrated and barred from contact with children and animals.

Not to get all biblical, but "what you do to the least amongst you..."

Fuck it,

Have this sick fuck attempt the same stunt with one of Michael Vick's pit bulls.

Tell that to the staff at DeVry, Albany.

and ditto for that stupid fuck from Alabama that assualted an 86 year old woman over the weekend.

http://www.wbbm780.com/Salesman-Charged-With-Sex-Assault-Of-86-Year-Old/2893462

WTF chicago?

Unbelievable. I agree he should be barred from contact with children or animals.

GriffinMill:

Oh please, you can't tell the difference from a deranged person attacking an injured animal and scientific experimentation?

Nelson Algren would have slapped the stupid right out of you for that kind of thinking.

No, I honestly cannot tell the difference between:

1. A man who throws a kitten off a balcony.
2. A DeVry student who cuts off a healthy lamb's toes for "scientific experimentation."
3. Joseph Mengele.
4. That 76-year-old man who poured boiling water on a trapped squirrel in his back yard.
5. A man who clubs baby seals.
6. Sarah Palin.
7. People who support KFC.
8. The Aurora man who dragged his pit bull behind his car to teach it some kind of lesson.
9. People who post craigslist notices like, "Moving to new place that doesn't allow dogs. Free dog."

No, I honestly cannot tell the difference between:

Then you need to go back to your grade school and demand that they refund your parent's tax money. You were cheated out of reasoning skills, discernment, judgment and perspective. In addition, you likely got a very cursory overview of human history as well. You been cheated son, you been robbed.

Mengele and Col. Sanders, equals in atrocity. I would pay every dime in my bank account to see you make that comparison to a survivor of the Shoah. They'd tear you apart like warm bread.

Mr. Griffin:
7. People who support KFC.

KFC is far worse than this sick kitten-throwing fuck, and all the other sick fucks in your list, but not for the reasons you think: KFC is worse because chicken is gross. I can't for the life of me understand eating this inferior meat when nearly every other meat, fish and fowl is far tastier.

Seriously, do you really think Kentucky Fried fast food is morally equivalent to Mengele? Are we the "Colonel's Willing Executioners?" Also, Godwin's Law, you lose.

A few weeks ago, I saw another sick @#%()*^ stomping on a squirrel and taking pictures of the aftermath. I witnessed this from a window of a house party. Soon enough a blessed soul came in to look after the animal, but could I have called the cops on this guy? That this creature was wild, I wasn't sure.

And I have ten bucks that says just before this kitten scratched him he was playing with it with his hands. The kitten probably thought he was playing and played back, like kittens do. But this idiot got all bent out of shape and tortured it. Bastard.

People who pick on animals, kids and the elderly deserve to rot in hell (if there is one).

Oh dear.

Another animal hurt.

Another chance for some Internet tough people to act as though they are in favor of medieval punishments for the offender.

Funny: Animal suffering tends to bring out emotions more firery than anything related to local corruption or even gangbanging (does one support the castration for gangbangers, lest they produce offspring who inherit the same nihilistic values?) If so, I find little evidence here.

No, I am not defending these anti-cat actions, for those who would assume. I hope this person, if found guilty, faces the maximum (legal) punishment, the same wish I have about all violent criminals. I am merely pointing out the insanity of acting as though this act deserves overly-harsh punishment--sorry, vengence--out of all proportion to the act. I am also pointing out the relative lack of such calls to vengence regarding those human beings who make our lives poorer every day in Chicago.

Now, back to your PETA-approved outraged ...

Nelson Algren would have slapped the stupid right out of you for that kind of thinking.

Well, from the works, letters, etc. of his I have read, Algren also disliked pretentious people pretending to be smart and morally superior--especially when doing so from the dark shadows, so to speak--so I think you might have been a target of his card-knicked palm before too long. What? You think you are the only person who reads in this city?

" for those who would assume."

Matilda has spoken

" for those who would assume."

any body up for throwing Matilda?

p.s some I bet algren would really really have dislike ScreamTilda and would be up for throwing her preferably some place with weeds
and in this case the only thing we could be charged with is
littering, or ilegal dumping if they really wanted to run wild with it

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Chicagoist

Chicagoist is a website about Chicago. More

Editor: Marcus Gilmer
Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

where is the chicagoist facebook fan page?
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Chicagoist.

All Our RSS