<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Morning Box Score</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php</link>
<description>All comments for Morning Box Score</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>jmagic</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465823</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465823</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:33:15 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Lincecum started 24 games last year and threw over 140 innings - he&apos;s hardly a rook. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tower18</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465486</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465486</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:43:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s not fair to compare veteran salaries to rookie salaries.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jmagic</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465396</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465396</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:53:14 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;For a guy pocketing $4.75 million, you&apos;d think he&apos;d post better than a 4.39 ERA. That said, it&apos;s better than Zito&apos;s 5+ ERA, but Marquis pulls in more dough than Tim Lincecum (possible NL Cy Young winner this year), who makes a paltry $405,000. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stealth</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465380</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465380</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:43:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hate Marquis? How about MacDougal in return?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mike_thoms</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465334</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465334</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:10:57 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I used to feel that way about Marquis...when are they going to get rid of him?  but he is a 5th starter and generally they&apos;re not great.  I think he&apos;s actually pretty good among other 5th starters in baseball.  he and howry won&apos;t make the playoff roster though, that&apos;s for damn sure.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Slaphappy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465308</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465308</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:50:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;when the hell are the Cubs going to get rid of Marquis?

He&apos;s the fifth starter in a five-man rotation -- I can&apos;t think of any fifth starters that are better than mediocre.

These two, IMO should definitely be left off the playoff roster.

Rest assured that they will be.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jmagic</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465297</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465297</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:42:24 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;when the hell are the Cubs going to get rid of Marquis? He&apos;s obviously the weak link in the rotation and commands too much money to be mediocre ... while they&apos;re at it, dump Howry. These two, IMO should definitely be left off the playoff roster. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ThisGuy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465256</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465256</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:57:36 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Also, since the Twins lost the magic number didn&apos;t &quot;remain at 9&quot;, it was &quot;reduced to 9&quot;.  Just nitpicking.  good feature.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mike_thoms</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465228</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/09/18/morning_box_score_32.php#comment-1465228</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:34:49 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is 4 runs really a spanking? You used the same word yesterday to describe the Sox beating the Yankees but then last night the sox also lost by 4 runs.  I&apos;d say that at a minimum you need a 7 run lead to consider it a spanking.  if you need a grand slam and a 3 run just to tie things up, you&apos;re being spanked.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
