<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Budgeting Into the Danger Zone</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/10/15/budgeting_into_the_danger_zone.php</link>
<description>All comments for Budgeting Into the Danger Zone</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>fremo</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/10/15/budgeting_into_the_danger_zone.php#comment-1488967</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/10/15/budgeting_into_the_danger_zone.php#comment-1488967</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:46:35 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Ditch about 10 aldermen.  There&apos;s a million there, just in salary.  

Also, aren&apos;t truck drivers for the city pulling in 70K a year?  To drive a truck?  For 8 hours a day?  Of which 2 hours are spent &quot;goofing off&quot;?

I&apos;d recommend looking over your alderman&apos;s relationship with the mayor, voting history, etc - and start now on a plan to unseat them in 2011.

In Uptown there is a full movement in effect.  Check out uptownupdate.com.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
