<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: CTA Passes Lower Fare Hike</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php</link>
<description>All comments for CTA Passes Lower Fare Hike</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Sears Tower</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515421</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515421</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:28:17 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It was all of 9.5 months ago your elected officials told you the 0.25% sales tax increase would be all they needed for effective transit,  which passed so easily Stroger added another 1% for no reason at all.  Now the largest fare hike since the 1980&apos;s before the year is out?  No city can nickel and dime your money away better than Chicago.

And now you will have a Chicago Democrat at the helm of all four levels of government!  Can we take all your money?  YES, WE CAN!  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sherlaura</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515291</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515291</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:24:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Any word on what will happen with my beloved U-Pass?  I&apos;m assuming the cost will go up as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>smussy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515285</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515285</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:22:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i love my monthly pass.  do i want to take a bus two blocks when i&apos;m carrying a ton of stuff? okay.  do i want to ride the train three times in 4 hours?  okay.  

i use it with impunity.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jmagic</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515246</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515246</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:01:03 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i still think i&apos;m getting screwed here ... but maybe that&apos;s because i think the CTA heads are as dumb as advertised. it just seems that no matter how much money these guys have they always need more and we always end up paying more or are threatened with service cuts.

and i agree that it&apos;s greener than multiple fare cards, but if it&apos;s taking more green out of my wallet, i&apos;ll gladly save the fare cards and construct a hat out of them. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mary_Sunshine</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515230</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515230</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:52:51 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;As far as the Chicago Card goes, I&apos;d use it just for the replacement factor. I lost mine last winter and someone else started using it before I could pick a new one up and get it canceled. Since mine is a ChicagoPlus, the CTA woman couldn&apos;t change the date of my paycheck takeout, but she gave me a 7 day pass to make up for the fact that another person had used it for a couple days. So hoo-ray for customer service. 

Plus it&apos;s greener than multiple bus cards. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chicago D</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515200</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515200</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:42:44 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The other point of the ChicagoCard is that they can centralize money collection (more of it in fewer places) and they get a float on your money when you put $20 on a card but don&apos;t use $20 immediately.

On balance the ChicagoCard is so much quicker and convenient that I will still use it though. The 10% influenced how much I put on the card at once, not whether I used the card.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ophmarketing</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515181</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515181</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:35:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;so what&apos;s the point of chicago card again?

It makes it easier for the city to track your movements? 

Oh, and you can allegedly get it replaced without losing your money. Or so they claim.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>three</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515171</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515171</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:31:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;so what&apos;s the point of chicago card again?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jmagic</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515170</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515170</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:30:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Teira -- i think that&apos;s gone. at least it was when they initially reported that they would be increasing fares. 

i&apos;ll admit that i&apos;m pretty dense with things ... but it almost seems that there is no advantage to having the chicago card, other than ease of use, but that easily overridden by the fact that it sometimes takes several touches to get through the turnstile. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Marcus Gilmer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515159</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515159</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:26:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Teira - According to the S-T, it&apos;s gone: &quot;The 10 percent Chicago Card bonus will be gone.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Teira</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515146</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515146</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:21:56 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is the $2 for a $20 preload incentive still there on the chicago cards?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>joshie</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515106</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515106</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:08:02 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The $0.50 increase for Chicago Card train riders is pretty steep. Glad I get the monthly pass with pre-tax money through work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lundah</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515074</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515074</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:56:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like the &quot;doomsday&quot; rates we almost had earlier this year.  So, it&apos;s the same fare increases we all were prepared for, without the service cuts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>three</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515042</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515042</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:39:42 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;maybe they&apos;re getting rid of free transfers?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chicago D</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515030</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/11/13/cta_passes_lower_fare_hike.php#comment-1515030</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:34:40 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Depending on how they implement the hike, $0.25 increments are probably the most convenient way for people. I mean, a fare of $1.98 would be a pain in the . . . tuckas.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>