<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Bail Denied For Balfour</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php</link>
<description>All comments for Bail Denied For Balfour</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>jennyblur</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531426</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531426</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:12:08 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is it possible he left his phone at the house when meeting previously with his estranged wife?

What exactly does &quot;near the home&quot; mean?  Within a mile? Two miles?  How far away did he LIVE?


FULL OF HOLES.  Reasonable doubt is a very difficult standard. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>BlueFairlane</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531391</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531391</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:55:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There might be cell phone records showing me near the Hudson home at the time of the murders. That doesn&apos;t mean I killed them, and it isn&apos;t conclusive evidence. It&apos;s circumstantial. They need something concrete.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ophmarketing</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531367</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531367</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:44:17 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;And the cell phone record showing him near the Hudson home at the time of the shootings, as opposed to at home, as he claimed?...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>BlueFairlane</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531364</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531364</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:43:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope they have something more tangible on this guy, myself. Otherwise, it&apos;s going to be hard to get a conviction on purely circumstantial evidence. It&apos;s not like he&apos;s George Ryan, after all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jennyblur</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531331</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531331</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:20:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;He never made a confession and none of this is in &quot;for the record&quot; yet.  So, let&apos;s all calm down.  


Any good defense lawyer is going to raise the &quot;is it possible&quot; questions on all of these counts...

Is it possible he bought and used a different El card?

Is it possible that he was in the station and the camera&apos;s didn&apos;t see him?

Is it possible he was lying about having a gun?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Albanyparkour</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531301</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531301</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:58:55 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh let him out, what&apos;s the worst he could-

Ah. Right. Never mind. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ophmarketing</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531261</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/03/bail_denied_for_balfour_1.php#comment-1531261</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:28:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Balfour told detectives that he was home at the time of the shootings, but cell phone records showed he was in the vicinity of the Hudson family home.
D&apos;oh!

Balfour told police that after he had earlier been to the Hudson home to talk with his estranged wife, he had taken a CTA &quot;L&quot; train to his West Side home. But CTA card records show that Balfour had last used the card two days before.

Double D&apos;oh!

 Also, Balfour had claimed to have used a particular &quot;L&quot; station, but surveillance cameras showed he had not been there. 

Sounds like someone needs a little refresher course on making sure ones alibi matches reality.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
