<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Supreme Court Silent on Obama Birth Certificate Lawsuit</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php</link>
<description>All comments for Supreme Court Silent on Obama Birth Certificate Lawsuit</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Not_another_username</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534977</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534977</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 17:26:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I suggest to anyone who takes this whole thing seriously to get out now!  Before Obama takes office.  Run away! Hide!  OMG, there&apos;s going to be a brown President!  

I suggest Paraguay--I believe the brown people can&apos;t come after you there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>schvenzlerman</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534515</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534515</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:32:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I was a Gravel supporter. Foreign policy espoused by Paul and Kucinich would not have been materially different. I will google schvenzlerman but it is my surname.

Not fake. My DR, LR, library and MBR are each 400 s.f.or slightly larger. You are not welcome to ride the elevator. You could have purchased a mansion too were you industrious considering how cheap money was in the late 90&apos;s. That said, they are money-pits and I do not recommend them unless you require the neighborhood.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ingrid</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534510</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534510</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:12:31 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There is no reasoning with the wingers.

They could have seen Obama&apos;s mother squeeze Obama from her vagina in the middle of Oklahoma and they still wouldn&apos;t believe it.

Or, maybe they would at that point, but then they would check that off the list and move to some other reason to get the black man out of the white house.


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>CL</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534509</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534509</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:08:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;

&quot;The Framers of the Constitution were protecting us from anyone serving as the President of the US from having alligience to any other country. Natural born is simply a child born of two US Citizens (naturalized or natural born), without any allegiance to any other nation (dual citizenship).

Just from a simple logical standpoint.

Let&apos;s say Mohamed Atta (9/11 attacker) impregnated an american women (US Citizen) while he was in our country planning the attacks. The child would be a US Citizen, however would you want this child to have the right to be the President of our Country?

This issue is much bigger than Obama and could have far reaching consequences to our country.&quot;


For fucks sake.  Do I have to say this again?  There is no definition of &quot;natural born&quot; in the Constitution.  

there is also no definition of &quot;life&quot; or &quot;liberty&quot;

These are all terms which are wide open that are left to the legislative branch to work with and the Supreme Court to interpret.  There are ground rules, but they can be expanded and restricted as necessary.  That&apos;s the genius of the constitution.


Point is, there is nothing definite about the constitution.  These words can mean however Congress wants to construe them within reason.

But why am I even bringing this up?  Obama was born in Hawaii.  Hawaii is a state, hence he was born on US soil and he happens to be the son of a parent who was born a citizen of the US.  Another fact is that conspiracy theorists are full of shit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>clarenceweatherspoon</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534490</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534490</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:28:36 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Yo, Clarence - Let me clarify. Were I a Marine, former or active, I would be proud of it. Military service is an honorable profession.&quot;

I was referencing another poster/poseur who claimed to be a Marine in another thread about this topic, and was making no value judgments for or against any branches of our military, just pointing out that it&apos;s easy and fun to lie on the internet. 

It&apos;s also very funny that you declare that critical thinking is dead, and cite &quot;Obamanite&quot; behavior to strengthen your point.  I invite you to take a look at the comments from the non-Obamanite faction in this thread: http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/04/obama_birth_certificate_case_heads.php

You will see that, while you may not be a mouth-breather, all of the mouthbreathers are on your side. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>schvenzlerman</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534486</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534486</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:20:04 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yo, Clarence - Let me clarify. Were I a Marine, former or active, I would be proud of it. Military service is an  honorable profession. The problem is that it&apos;s been used principally for business purposes rather than defense for about a hundred years.

The majority of posters on this blog are rabid Obamanites for reason that critical thinking is dead in America; the Messiah sounded good and details don&apos;t matter. Nearly all of you went to public schools at least until college, so go figure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>clarenceweatherspoon</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534485</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534485</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:14:56 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So, too bad about Ron Paul, eh, Schvenzlerman?  I am assuming you are the same Schvenzlerman revealed by the google... 

If the Democratic and Republican parties are identical as you argue, how could you support Paul?  He has a big R next to his name too...

Well, at least you have your fake mansion to comfort you.  Hey, can I come over and take a ride in your fake elevator?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>schvenzlerman</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534479</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534479</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:02:17 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;No, I am not a Marine.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>clarenceweatherspoon</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534476</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534476</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:57:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Celerysalt - I live in a 10,600 s.f. 32 room turn of the century four story mansion with three staircases, ten working fireplaces and an elevator.&quot;

Are you also a Marine?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>schvenzlerman</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534473</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534473</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:53:53 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Celerysalt - I live in a 10,600 s.f. 32 room turn of the century four story mansion with three staircases, ten working fireplaces and an elevator. There is no plausible reason for me to masturbate in the woodshed (no disrespect to masturbation).

I could care less whether Obama is brown, yellow, white or green. He&apos;s a complete fraud no different than McCain. You Obamanites drank his anti-war kool-aid and you will, mark my words, not make a peep when he starts murdering hundreds of thousands of foreigners for U.S. national security (business) interests.

My point is that you really don&apos;t care about the law. Assume that the SCOTUS rules (I think that it won&apos;t be granted Certiorari) that a natural born person cannot have dual citizenship. You would freak out and rue the day because rule of law means less to you than your precious rock star. You might as well be a neo-conservatives cooing about Palin.

Clinton=Bush=Obama&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>cmac26</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534460</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534460</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:29:56 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Sherryande:

Hears a counterexample to yours. If we accept your (Donofrio&apos;s) supposition:

Britain could pass a law tomorrow conferring British citizenship, retroactively, to everyone born in the US. There is nothing we could do to stop them from doing this. Therefore all US Born Citizen would have dual citizenship and NO ONE would be eligible to be president. The fact is, British law is irrelevant to how his US Citizenship was conferred, which was by right of birth. 

And in response to your example, yes, Atta&apos;s kid would be Natural Born and eligible to be POTUS. My personal opinion of it is irrelevant. That&apos;s why America rocks!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jackson93</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534452</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534452</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:56:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;sherryande,

That is absolutely not the definition of a natural born citizen.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401----000-.html

Just from a constitutional and legal standpoint.

And since when is a child responsible for the crimes of his father? You have no idea what Atta&apos;s fictional child could have been like. He could have grown up and been disgusted by his father&apos;s action. You can&apos;t just decide that people should not be legally eligible for public office based on the actions of their parents. That&apos;s why we have elections - to allow the people to decide who they believe is fit for office.

I feel sorry for you people for being so afraid and so incapable of dealing with reality - it must be a miserable existence.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sherryande</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534438</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534438</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:19:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Framers of the Constitution were protecting us from anyone serving as the President of the US from having alligience to any other country. Natural born is simply a child born of two US Citizens (naturalized or natural born), without any allegiance to any other nation (dual citizenship).

Just from a simple logical standpoint.

Let&apos;s say Mohamed Atta (9/11 attacker) impregnated an american women (US Citizen) while he was in our country planning the attacks. The child would be a US Citizen, however would you want this child to have the right to be the President of our Country?

This issue is much bigger than Obama and could have far reaching consequences to our country. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>johntheadams</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534423</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534423</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:58:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;What are those goofballs doing in that circle&quot;

They&apos;re doing the circle jerk, and praying to their god that they can get a black man disqualified.


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>johntheadams</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534420</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534420</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:55:59 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The fundamentalists are like bees in a frenzy. May I suggest that you commit mass suicide by drowning yourselves? 

If I had it my way I&apos;d throw all of you in mental institutions for life.


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ward Up</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534418</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534418</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:48:26 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What are those goofballs doing in that circle?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ron Mar</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534416</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534416</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:35:49 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh the Lib Dem Obamaniacs. Bless their hearts and their empty heads too. 
Their avoidance of this vital Constitutional issue, rejection of even the possibility of a God and the language they use tells us all we need to know about them. 
They are no brighter than the Howard Stern on the street interviews, the Zogby/Ziegler video, their scores on the American Civics Literacy Test, the Wal*Mart stampede, protestors outside the courtroom sentencing of OJ, and Dr. Lyle Rossiter&apos;s new book about their mental illness shows them to be. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>celerysalt</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534411</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534411</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:06:36 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;BTW - i&apos;m sure you could find some friends to join you in worshipping Zool on Sealand.   May I suggest starting with the folks pictured above?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>celerysalt</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534409</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534409</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:04:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;hey schizophrenicman:

first off, you&apos;ll see i kindly corrected your screen name.  and you&apos;re welcome.

secondly, i&apos;m afraid you have made no rational argument related to removing the president-elect from his place as president-elect.  not liking him, or the fact that he is black, or the fact that his father was a Kenyan isn&apos;t going to change the fact that he was lawfully elected.  Suck it up.  Or move.  Either works.

i ask you all this again.  Obama now has level one security clearance with the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc.  He had clearance as a Senator, when he was going on diplomatic missions abroad to incredibly sensitive areas.  Now, the boys I just mentioned - CIA, etc - hold on to your tin-foil hat here, but let&apos;s remember...these are the guys who can see you masterbating in your woodshed with your dad&apos;s dirty magazines from space.  Do you actually think that they missed something like this in the process of letting Obama speak with Hamid Karzai?

we&apos;re a smart bunch here at chicago - as a first time poster, you wouldn&apos;t know that - and so far, in a couple of threads, a number of us (all better versed in the constitution than &quot;you people&quot;) have taken you out to the woodshed regarding your &quot;claim&quot;.

Build a bridge, friend.  Get over it.  There&apos;s a big, black man in the White House.  He&apos;s smart and gifted and likes the working class.  Don&apos;t like it?  I suggest you go and try to find another drunk and incompetent Bush to run against him in 2012.  Or, like I said, pack!  Theocracies are all the rage these days, so there&apos;s a number to choose from.  Maybe you can even annex a little bit of Sealand or something and establish the worship of Zool as mandatory there.


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>johntheadams</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534404</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534404</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:50:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Colonization. Occupation. Subjugation. Oppression. Death (and more torture). Obama is NOT leaving Iraq under any circumstances, but none of you Obamanites will actually give a crap. You are all pathetic anti-war fakes. Please have your sons and daughters enlist today.&quot;

That Obama is an imperialist enemy of the working class (imperialism needed a facelift) is irrelevant to the fact that this lawsuit is an attack on black people. They don&apos;t want a black man in the White House irrespective of his politics or policies. Obama has the democratic right to be hated if that&apos;s the path he chooses to take. We pay for our bad choices. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>johntheadams</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534403</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534403</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:43:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The name of this stupid lawsuit should be cahnged to what it really is:
&quot;Donofrio v. the election of a black man as President&quot;


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>johntheadams</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534402</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534402</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:41:15 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Natural Born&quot; means born on U.S. soil (within a state, territory, the District of Columbia, or even within an American embassy or consulate anywhere in the world). The Supreme Court is highly unlikely to revise this interpretation of the Constitution. If he was born in Hawaii, and his parents were Mexicans illegally there, he would still be a natural born U.S. citizen. Dual nationality notwithstanding, if you are born on U.S. soil you are a natural born U.S. citizen even if you are a tri-national.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>johntheadams</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534401</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534401</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:40:25 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Natural Born&quot; means born on U.S. soil (within a state, territory, the District of Columbia, or even within an American embassy or consulate anywhere in the world). The Supreme Court is highly unlikely to revise this interpretation of the Constitution. If he was born in Hawaii, and his parents were Mexicans illegally there, he would still be a natural born U.S. citizen. Dual nationality notwithstanding, if you are beorn on U.S. soil you are a natural born U.S. citizen even if you are a tri-national.




&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>schvenzlerman</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534399</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534399</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:25:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&apos;I said that I would remove our combat troops from Iraq in 16 months, with the understanding that it might be necessary – likely to be necessary – to maintain a residual force to provide potential training, logistical support, to protect our civilians in Iraq,&apos;

That&apos;s Obama THIS WEEK. So much for ending the war in Iraq since the new, improved Obama plan is to keep TENS OF THOUSANDS of troops there.

Colonization. Occupation. Subjugation. Oppression. Death (and more torture). Obama is NOT leaving Iraq under any circumstances, but none of you Obamanites will actually give a crap. You are all pathetic anti-war fakes. Please have your sons and daughters enlist today.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>schvenzlerman</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534396</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534396</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 06:47:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Obama&apos;s administration will kill more brown-skinned people than in Bush and Cheney&apos;s wildest dreams. Obamanites have seem all the change they&apos;re going to see.

The Democratic and Republican party electorate must come to grips with the fact that there is no fundamental difference between the two parties. They both exist to help our ruling class pillage the world, including the American masses.

Assume for purpose of discussion that Obama indeed is Constitutionally ineligibile for the office based on the natural born person requirement. The bottom-line is that Obamanites do not care for three principle reasons:

1. They don&apos;t care about the law; all that counts is the outcome. Law is for other people.

2. They naively think that Obama is going to be different than President Idiot.

3. It&apos;s sort of like a football game.

Look at the neoconservatives flocking to Obama&apos;s administration. See how the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations have already issued blueprints for Obama&apos;s foreign policy (of more war). Expect mountains of additional debt to be heaped onto the backs of your grandchildren in a continuing process of looting the middle class and poor.

There will be NO change. You Obamanites deserve him in the same way that Republicans deserved Bush. You all have your heads up your arses.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ulverwolf</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534289</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534289</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:11:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Not only is Obama of dubious citizenship, he&apos;s not even black. 

He&apos;s a mulato!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jackson93</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534261</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534261</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:26:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;there is a great article on salon about why a conspiracy obsessive like our visitor &quot;johnadams&quot; will never be persuaded by any evidence.

Key quotes:

&quot;The more data you present a person, the more they doubt it ... Once you&apos;re committed, especially behaviorally committed or financially committed, the more impossible it becomes to change your mind.&quot;

&quot;People who believe in a conspiracy theory develop a selective perception, their mind refuses to accept contrary evidence.&quot;

&quot;The real evidence is out there, [and] you can give them all this evidence, but they&apos;ll have convenient ways to discredit [it]. Whatever can&apos;t be ignored can be twisted to fit into the narrative; every new disclosure of something that should, by rights, end the controversy only opens up new questions, identifies new plotters.&quot;
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/05/birth_certificate/

So, our poor Mr. Adams et al just become deeper entrenched in their conspiracy and farther from reality - hence the utterly puerile and nonsensical limerick. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dopplerd</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534256</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534256</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:03:25 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;johnadams:

That limerick would kill in some other forums.  In the real world it makes people think you are an eight year old perv.

You and these &quot;lawsuits&quot; are to Obama like the crazy, stinky homeless guy ranting racist comments on the L is to me.  To even respond gives more credence than is due.

The $12 dollar report will not be enough for you.  As has been stated before the issue you have is with some sort of dual citizenship BS and his father being Kenyan.  These things are facts and not disputed (just like his birth in Hawaii) but invalidate his presidency in your opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sherlaura</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534239</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534239</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:49:31 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;d like to explain to johnadams where babies come from.... because apparently he thinks you can shove sperm up someone&apos;s butt via a hanky and make a baby.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>celerysalt</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534232</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534232</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:34:27 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;okay then!

we&apos;ve officially downshifted from crazy into full-on klan rally.


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>johnadams</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534216</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534216</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:13:45 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The mystery of Obama&apos;s conception and birth have been found:
There was a young man from Kilkanky,
he collected his sperm in a hanky,
he left it on public bus seats,
there for young buttocks to meet,
and that&apos;s how Obama was born.

Now if Obama would sign the release and pay the $12.00 to the State of Hawaii Health Department we could figure out where that bus was located.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Marcus Gilmer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534175</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534175</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:32:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;dopplerd - hell no. i&apos;m keeping that stuff quarantined like the monkey in Outbreak.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dopplerd</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534172</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534172</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:29:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;FYI: johnadams and a bunch of single posters are already posting on the DCist comments section of this story.  

Marcus:  Can you just copy the entire comment string from yesterdays story?  It would allow the crazies more time to get back to tin foil hat construction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>celerysalt</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534149</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534149</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:08:03 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;These were just the posts I was hoping for.  You guys rarely disappoint.

I&apos;m just going to call this whole thing.  It&apos;s over, basement-dwellers.  Obama is our new big, black President. His wife is prettier than yours, and his kids are smarter.  And there&apos;s not a damn thing you can do about it.  

Except move, of course, which I wholly encourage.

After 8 years of that effing idiot in the oval office, it feels good to yell, in my best-Parker-Posey in Dazed and Confused voice.....

&quot;Suffer, sisters!!!....SUFFER!!!&quot;

(ketchup and mustard all over the place, etc.)

God Bless!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ingrid</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534120</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534120</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:55:04 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This is just so typical of the wing nuts. They don&apos;t give two shits about the country and what is going on right now.

Obama is probably the best thing that could have happened to this place, but I&apos;m not even going to argue that point.

What I&apos;d like to put forth is the fact that Obama has so much on his plate right now, there is so much that is wrong. This is really a frightening, frightening time, so why can&apos;t they just leave it be?

Must they keep shoveling shit? They&apos;re not thinking about the country, they can&apos;t get beyond their own selfishness and lunacy to put country first. That concept is just beyond their comprehension.

They have so much time and energy and they refuse to do something productive with it. For crying out loud, we lived with Bush for EIGHT fucking years, so just get over it. Put your energy into something productive for once. Put your country before your small thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sfrazer_chicago</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534105</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534105</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:46:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;If (as expected) the Court tosses the suit, Bredow will start challenging Obama&apos;s legitimacy based on &quot;foreign money that went into his campaign.&quot;

This is what shows that the lawsuit was never intended to &quot;uphold the constitution.&quot;  It was designed because this guy doesn&apos;t like the nation&apos;s choice for our next President.

Expect 4 years of whining from him, until you barely notice it anymore, like background noise.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>bunnybear</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534073</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534073</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:37:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, I guess my estimate of numbers somewhere between a bridge game and a Nugent concert leaned more towards the card game.

I can&apos;t believe our new friends haven&apos;t found this post yet.

Be vewy vewy quiet...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jimbo</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534068</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534068</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:33:57 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Who would have thought that anything other than a bicycle v. automobile argument would get 200+ comments on Chicagoist?  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>DNashty</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534055</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534055</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:27:58 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Really, everyone&apos;s asking questions.&quot; Actually, yes, I am asking a question: Why are these people such raging lunatics? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>BlueFairlane</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534052</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1534052</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:25:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, the problem&apos;s obvious. Steve Jobs must have dual citizenship, thus prompting Obama the Kenyan Kollaborator to go with Zune and the evil empire. This could all be solved if Jobs would simply come out and address this issue. Come on, Jobs. This would only cost TWELVE DOLLARS!!! An ipod&apos;s what, a couple hundred?

Now I&apos;m off to check what wikipedia has on the constitutional merits of ipods.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JAH</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1533991</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1533991</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:51:10 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That photo is awesome.  I&apos;ve always wanted to hold a circle jerk on the steps of the Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>pantagrapher</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1533986</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1533986</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:47:50 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;OK, let&apos;s do this again.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Albanyparkour</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1533965</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1533965</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:38:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;How dare you criticize Ron Paul

(You hear that sound? It&apos;s a MILLION Paultards and Obama-haters honing in on our little Chicagoist fief. Sounds like buffalo made of stupid)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jennyblur</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1533952</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/05/no_word_from_supreme_court_on_obama.php#comment-1533952</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:35:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought there would be riots?!  

Bigger FAIL than Ron Paul. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>