Given the large numbers quoted in recent unemployment reports, we knew the recession was affecting most industries -- bankers and baristas, factory workers and football players. Wait... what?!? Yes, even professional athletes are feeling the economic downtown. While Major League baseball players continue to land record contracts, some of the lesser sports are feeling the pinch. After weeks of rumors, the Arena Football League is expected to announce on Monday that it will be suspending operations for its 2009 season, but hopes to return for 2010. The 2009 campaign was to begin in early March.
Speculation that the sixteen-team AFL was in trouble began when the league repeatedly delayed the disbursement draft for players that had been with the recently folded New Orleans VooDoo, while the league determined other financial matters. A vote by the league's board of directors confirmed the league's fate on Sunday night. We guess even Ditka is no match for this wicked economy.
Sunday's vote reversed a vote taken Wednesday night. The issue was that "too many big-name owners or teams in big-name cities said they would not return in 2009," including the Chicago Rush. Also expected to sit out the '09 campaign were teams from Dallas, Colorado, Georgia, Cleveland and defending ArenaBowl champion Philadelphia. Only five teams were definitely committed to fielding teams for the upcoming season. When so many teams suggested they would likely shut down, ESPN said it would pull the plug on its TV deal if the AFL tried to play with only six to eight teams. That left the AFL little choice but to shut the entire league down and try to restructure for 2010.
So what's the Arena Football League's shutdown mean for the Rush? Well, it sounds like they were in trouble anyway. But for how long has their ownership/management known this? And how does the league's decision affect the team's long term prospects? Would the Rush have disappeared forever if the league had carried on without them? Perhaps the league's timeout will save the franchise. That presumably is of little solace to the players, who will be unemployed. These guys weren't making the big bucks their NFL counterparts make so the loss of income will really sting. Instead of making appearances at Home Depot or Jewel, they might just end up working there instead. If they're lucky enough to even land a job in this economy. And while the players try to earn a real living, they'll have to stay in shape in hopes that the AFL doesn't end up like the USFL or XFL and disappear forever.

Weekend Diversion: Night Of The Ponies


that sucks ass.
i never even got to see an AFL game, and now it's no more.
Boo Hoo. What is Jon Bon Jovi going to do now with his Philly team. I cannot stand that guy. Rich guy you know what
Too bad. Arena Football is pretty intense. How long is the Shamrock Lacrosse team going to last out of the Sears Centre?
The Shamrox folded in the last couple weeks.
I've attended pretty much every Rush game in the past 7 years (and many away games), so it's sad not to see this tradition continue into 2009.
On the flipside, stuff at the AFL league level was pretty messed up, and as much as I hate the NFL influence on the league, something needed to give.
My hopes aren't high that we'll see a season in 2010, but the Rush have a solid ownership group and from what I've been able to tell, had a decent business model. It would be good to see them return in some form.
Tannerman: What was attendance like at the games? Was it the same home and away?
Thanks.
Chicago averaged about 15,800 last season, which was the 3rd highest in the league. You can see all attendance numbers here:
http://www.arenafan.com/history/?page=yearly&fpage=attendance&league=1
Away attendance varied because of size of stadium. For example, Grand Rapids' stadium only holds about 9-10,000 vs. the Allstate Arena which can hold about 16-17,000
Everyone associates the Rush with Ditka, but the team actually played for many years without him. He was brought on as a partner (no one ever says what percentage he owns, but my gut is very small) I believe primarily for marketing reasons... which has helped. But the core of the operations are run by a group of 3 other owners. This is in contrast to many other teams in the league which have heavy NFL ownership/involvement, such as Colorado, Dallas, New Orleans (which folded a few months ago), etc.
Yet another example of a league biting off more than it could chew. The league lost a lot of its charm for me when the franchises in Albany and Iowa moved away -- those were stable franchises with rabid fan bases, gone in search of more money. I'll be very surprised if the league comes back in 2010.
I would imagine this is why the MLS is shit-scared of raising salaries. I too doubt that the league will come back - it just seems like the smart money is on it not.
What were the Bruisers a part of back in the day? Didn't we have another arena football team in there somewhere?
If arena football is considered a farm system for the NFL, then no wonder why it failed.
What about the Schaumburg Flyers? Are they feeling this trendy economic bite?
Chicago Slaughter
Chicago Force