<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Drew Peterson Engaged to Future Ex-Wife No. 5</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php</link>
<description>All comments for Drew Peterson Engaged to Future Ex-Wife No. 5</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>CL</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1547788</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1547788</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:39:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Irish. Some other reasons besides the one you stated:

1. He&apos;s a cop.
2. He has (or had) power.
3. He is likely very charming.
4. I am sure that he has claimed his innocence to this woman.
5. She believes him.
6. Perhaps she has low self-esteem. Maybe some &quot;daddy issues&quot;.
7. She enjoys the limelight as much as he does.
8. Because maybe she figures that since everyone is watching him closely now, she is likely to stay alive.
9. She likes the porn &apos;stache.
10. They are in love! *sigh*
------------------------------------------------


In a game of Family Feud, I believe number 6 would be the #1 answer.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>happyfunball</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1545135</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1545135</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:30:20 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;And lundah wins this article&apos;s comments section.

Grats.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tower18</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1545109</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1545109</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:06:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I know of a girl who stays with a guy with a history of lying, cheating, stealing, and preying on women (shit, it&apos;s on TAPE too...busted by a news crew), and she stays with him.  Why?  Who knows.

But there are a lot of women who, despite DAMNING evidence to the contrary, will stick by their men.  Perhaps they&apos;re into that whole &quot;reforming a bad boy&quot; thing.  &quot;Oh, he&apos;ll change for ME!.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>irishman1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544907</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544907</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:50:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Stupid&quot;?

Well played, genius.  

You sound like Tommy Boy.  &quot;No...ur stupid, richard!!&quot;.

The nuthouse called, Spook.

You are due back by 5:00.

And bring your hypocrisy with you. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spook</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544895</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544895</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:44:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Heeeyyyyyyy Irishman
why don&apos;t you replace &quot;Irish&quot; with Stupid, as in &quot;Stupidman&quot;. Least you reflect poorly upon real Irish Men like James Joyce, Sam Beck, George Shaw, Yeats,Emerson etc.


I know this is light years beyond your comprehension, but what you( and too many Americans) consider &quot;humor&quot; feeds our culture of endemic and systematic violence against women and girls. I bet you felt right at home with the other frat boys in the shower, standing in a circle soaping yourselves up into a frantic lather, getting off on base white male stupidity. Yup, right at home, old boy. 

Matter of fact, I bet before Drew Peterson, got &quot;exposed&quot; publicly for the animal that he is, you probably would have considered him a cool elder &quot;bro&quot; if you encountered him at a bar. 

Yay, Ye dear olde Yule Tide Spook thinkith that when it comes right down to the matter, Nay a line seperates
ye two bros, if you dig my olde English ;-) &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>irishman1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544837</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544837</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:16:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@lola09:

The nuthouse called.

You are due back by 5:00. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lola09</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544788</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544788</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:50:01 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;UTV said,
I don&apos;t know why that strikes me as so funny. 
I just love the phrase &quot;maximum levels of aggression&quot; in the bedroom context. 
It&apos;s like something out of a sex manual 
that&apos;s also a nuclear submarine manual.

Interesting analogy, UTV.  
Because unforunately there are some malajusted, misogynist males who do use sexual behavior as an act of war.
And Drew Peterson has already left casualties in his wake 
in his own personal war on women.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Slaphappy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544720</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544720</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:16:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;SlapHappy: Once you accept who you are you gain the testicular fortitude to seek out what you want and obtain it. You can do it too if you stop focusing on what other men are doing.

Uh, thanks for the tip.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stealth</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544698</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544698</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:58:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;After reading this story, OJ&apos;s slumped on his bunk in his cell, smacking himself in the head, saying, &quot;Stupid... stupid... stupid&quot; over and over again.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Albanyparkour</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544666</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544666</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:36:49 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@UTV:
Sounds like rough trade.

@Irishman1:
Bijou, thursday, 2am. After the suburban dads thin out.  I&apos;ll be in a dark red snowsuit. Unzip and see.


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>poptart</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544656</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544656</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:30:59 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@UTV clearly its a threat level orange. Just like the jumpsuit Drew will be sporting once wife #5 disappears. HA. Well maybe that wasn&apos;t as clever as I hoped but I tried.

Things like this make me seriously ashamed of my gender. How can you be so stupid? But then maybe this one really is a hooker and they really are getting physical....ggrrroooosssss&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>vultureProtein</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544652</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544652</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:29:53 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;UTV: Sex is violence, duh.  Aggression is relevant in this context.

SlapHappy: Once you accept who you are you gain the testicular fortitude to seek out what you want and obtain it.  You can do it too if you stop focusing on what other men are doing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>PhotoshopAbuser</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544651</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544651</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:29:18 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Stealth....you would win the Best Link of the Day award if there was such a thing. That was great!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>UTV</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544627</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544627</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:17:54 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Being good in bed has nothing to do with anatomical size, 
or maximum levels of aggression.&quot;

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHHA

I don&apos;t know why that strikes me as so funny. I just love the phrase &quot;maximum levels of aggression&quot; in the bedroom context. It&apos;s like something out of a sex manual that&apos;s also a nuclear submarine manual.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Slaphappy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544609</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544609</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:07:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Not to be too crude, but Drew is probably hung like a horse and rips it up in bed.

Dude, that&apos;s what I always think when some ugly dickwipe with no charisma lands woman after woman after woman.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>irishman1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544595</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544595</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:59:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;oh sweet, Lola.  Fair enough. 

You didn&apos;t get it that it was a joke, and of course you go off suggesting &quot;i was doing it all wrong&quot;. 

Cute.

Did I mention it was a joke?  Keep up, Merlin.

@albanyparkour...lavender?  Of course!  Name the place and time, and I&apos;ll rip it up with ya. 

:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stealth</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544582</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544582</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:56:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Irishman1, really sweetie, all this talk about Drew&apos;s manly pipe-laying...come to the lavendar side honey. 

Keep it up, albany. You may be Drew&apos;s No. 6... well if California gets its shit together...


JK...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>highfidelity</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544577</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544577</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:54:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;people... they&apos;re the worst&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lola09</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544566</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544566</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:48:56 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;oh irishman1,.... i now see your problem. 
It may not be what you read, but your ability to read.

There is no contradiction in my post. You still don&apos;t get it.  
Being good in bed has nothing to do with anatomical size, 
or maximum levels of aggression.

And there&apos;s a little more to it than thrusting.    
Perhaps you didn&apos;t know that you were doing it all wrong ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Albanyparkour</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544564</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544564</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:48:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Irishman1, really sweetie, all this talk about Drew&apos;s manly pipe-laying...come to the lavendar side honey. 


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>BlueFairlane</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544558</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544558</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:46:44 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Blagojevich should appoint Drew Peterson senator.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>irishman1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544551</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544551</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:45:35 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@vultureprotein...hmmmm...I think the short yellow bus forgot you, along with Lola. 

It was a joke, Francis.  Lighten up. 

:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lundah</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544549</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544549</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:45:08 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;May wedding, September search party?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>vultureProtein</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544542</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544542</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:42:53 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Irishman1: I wouldn&apos;t go around admitting that you don&apos;t know what a real woman wants.

Are you really Drew Peterson?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>irishman1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544512</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544512</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:27:46 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@lola09...Lighten up, Francis.  Everyone got the joke except you.  

Don&apos;t look now, lola, but you did contradict yourself. 

You first said, &quot;REAL WOMEN do not want to have a guy who, &quot;rips it up in bed&quot;.&quot;

Then you finished it with And there are no shortage of younger, attractive men out there who are great in bed

Which is it? 

Is being &quot;good in bed&quot; something REAL WOMEN want?

Or no?

Wait a minute!  Are you even a woman???&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>michellemybelle</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544503</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544503</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:23:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Stealth: You have been making me chuckle all morning. The registry comment has honestly made my day. 

Sadly, it&apos;s also a gift they both can use.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lola09</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544492</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544492</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:19:29 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i would speculate that this young woman is either a demented attention seeker, or a very cunning young opportunist who may be seeking her own book deal.  ....  $$$  Cha-Ching ! $$$


 irishman1............i suggest you seek the opinion of real women, rather that relying on the erroneous myths perpetuated in porn.
REAL WOMEN do not want to have, &quot;it hung like a horse&quot; 
or a guy who, &quot;rips it up in bed&quot;. 

And there are no shortage of younger, attractive men out there who are great in bed without having to settle for a finacially ruined, murderous old walrus who&apos;s probably dependant on viagra.  
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Albanyparkour</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544471</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544471</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:08:27 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I just wish gay marriage were legal here in Illinois. I think Drew and Blago would make a handsome couple.


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stealth</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544448</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544448</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:52:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&apos;t there some way that the Blagojevich and Drew Peterson stories can converge?

Look at that one line in the story above:

Peterson: &quot;How the f--- did this get out?&quot; 

C&apos;mon, f----? That&apos;s classic Blago!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ward Up</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544432</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544432</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:47:13 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&apos;t there some way that the Blagojevich and Drew Peterson stories can converge?  A common ex-girlfriend?  A payoff to Blago in a Bolingbrook subdivision?  An extra deceased wife somewhere?  Let&apos;s keep the circus in town!  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spook</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544421</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544421</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:38:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Free O.J.!!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stealth</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544420</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544420</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:37:50 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe this whole thing is just a weird coincidence. 

Yes, five weird coincidences...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Von Erich</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544416</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544416</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:32:08 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Not to be a dick, but that woman deserves anything coming to her.  At 23, you probably have missed some of the self-esteem classes required to act as a normal adult.  Have fun.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stealth</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544409</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544409</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:27:57 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Drew Peterson proposing (possibly NSFW):

Peterson proposal&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jennyblur</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544407</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544407</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:26:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;He hasn&apos;t actually been convicted or even arrested for anything.  

Maybe this whole thing is just a weird coincidence. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Saturnine</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544393</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544393</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:20:00 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any possibility she is a Manchurian Candidate?  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>vultureProtein</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544368</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544368</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:09:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Death Wish + Daddy Issues = Engagement To Drew Peterson&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Albanyparkour</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544357</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544357</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:05:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Local woman commits suicide by husband, film at 11&quot;


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mucky Fingers</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544354</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544354</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:01:29 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Balls. This guy&apos;s got some serious fucking balls.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ingrid</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544351</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544351</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:00:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, Irishman, for putting an image into my head that up til now I had not even thought of.

I have to go and purge now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Rachelle Bowden</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544332</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544332</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:48:55 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Future Ex-Wife No. 5&quot; ? I think you mean Future Dead-Wife No. 3&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stealth</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544321</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544321</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:44:50 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Where are they registered? I&apos;m pretty sure it&apos;s here...

Peterson nuptials&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ophmarketing</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544313</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544313</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:38:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;11. Wishes she was dead.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sparky</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544301</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544301</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:33:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Irish. Some other reasons besides the one you stated:

1. He&apos;s a cop.
2. He has (or had) power.
3. He is likely very charming.
4. I am sure that he has claimed his innocence to this woman.
5. She believes him.
6. Perhaps she has low self-esteem. Maybe some &quot;daddy issues&quot;.
7. She enjoys the limelight as much as he does.
8. Because maybe she figures that since everyone is watching him closely now, she is likely to stay alive.
9. She likes the porn &apos;stache.
10. They are in love! *sigh*
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mich</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544295</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544295</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:29:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Im sorry, I dont care how hung that guy is, I wouldnt touch him with a ten foot pole.  Says something about preying on women with zero self esteem and no confidence (and probably daddy issues as my co-worker pointed out.)


I&apos;m in.  7/12/2011.  Its going to be a quick one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>irishman1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544275</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544275</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:19:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Not to be too crude, but Drew is probably hung like a horse and rips it up in bed. 

What else could it be? 

He has no money, look at his history and look at that &apos;stache...what is the appeal that he has on women?

The appeal is probably, **cue bass line**, his length and his width.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>UTV</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544274</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544274</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:19:01 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Would it be in poor taste to suggest a No.5 death pool?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mikely1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544271</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544271</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:17:40 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;He&apos;s got the kavorka.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Marcus Gilmer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544263</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544263</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:10:49 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Best quote from one of the linked stories: &quot;The engagement continues Peterson&apos;s pattern of courting women less than half his age and proposing while still married.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>bellystar</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544262</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544262</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:09:13 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;part svengali, part muppet&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tankboy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544258</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544258</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:07:06 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Hi baby, will you marry me ... and sign this insurance policy? Love you!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mich</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544236</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544236</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:55:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;And, one more thing, what stupid woman would have any type of relations with that man?!  Much less marry him?!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mich</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544234</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544234</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:54:50 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;whaaaa?  I didnt know it was possible to be that big of an asshole!  It just keeps coming!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ophmarketing</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544232</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/12/17/drew_peterson_engaged_to_future_exw.php#comment-1544232</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:53:40 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;If we ever needed Steve Dahl back on the radio, that time is now. Damn you, CBS Radio!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
