http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/14/re-impeached_second_verse_same_as_t.php All comments for Re-Impeached: Second Verse Same As The First en-us 2009 Marcus Gilmer Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:15:00 -0600 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss marcusisabadass@gmail.com marcusisabadass@gmail.com 60 http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/14/re-impeached_second_verse_same_as_t.php#comment-1563410 http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/14/re-impeached_second_verse_same_as_t.php#comment-1563410 Comments Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:53:10 -0600 <p>Yes, that does indeed explain a lot. Thanks for the info.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/14/re-impeached_second_verse_same_as_t.php#comment-1563400 http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/14/re-impeached_second_verse_same_as_t.php#comment-1563400 Comments Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:45:49 -0600 <p>He's no longer in the House. Which explains his "lame duck" move.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/14/re-impeached_second_verse_same_as_t.php#comment-1563397 http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/14/re-impeached_second_verse_same_as_t.php#comment-1563397 Comments Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:42:59 -0600 <p>So, did Milt Patterson change his vote this time, or is he no longer a member of the House?</p> http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/14/re-impeached_second_verse_same_as_t.php#comment-1563384 http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/14/re-impeached_second_verse_same_as_t.php#comment-1563384 Comments Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:37:22 -0600 <p>Was Mell elected to be a sister-in-law, or a Representative? If she was my Rep, I'd be pissed.</p>