<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: The Friday Flashback: Otto Kerner, Jr.</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/23/the_friday_flashback_otto_kerner_jr.php</link>
<description>All comments for The Friday Flashback: Otto Kerner, Jr.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>mm65</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/23/the_friday_flashback_otto_kerner_jr.php#comment-1571357</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/01/23/the_friday_flashback_otto_kerner_jr.php#comment-1571357</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:01:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Missing from the above description of the Kerner case is that the legal theory of intangible right to honest government used by Thompson (and his first assistant Sam Skinner) against Kerner was later found unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. It was too late for Kerner, who had died by then, but others convicted under that theory were granted new hearings or had their case overturned. Congress, however, did later codify the intangible rights theory.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
