<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Touch &amp; Go On Its Way Out? Scales Back Operations</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php</link>
<description>All comments for Touch &amp; Go On Its Way Out? Scales Back Operations</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:45:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Tankboy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592295</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592295</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:08:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You&apos;re still missing the point ... he was asked to comment and said he would release an official statement later, thus adding credence to Brent&apos;s original reporting.

And some days we do all original reporting, and some days we aggregate and comment on the news (and credit our sources).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>AnotherMark</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592288</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592288</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:02:27 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Tankboy, your original post AND your explanation are both basically saying &quot;some dude told us this so we posted it&quot;. T&amp;G is, was, and will always be Corey Rusk... not some bong-jockey in the warehouse. If you want the story FIRST BEFORE YOU POST, talk to Corey. He is literally a phone call away (a local call!).... not to mention probably less than a mile from where your butt cheeks rest. Corey&apos;s statement says nothing about the label &apos;calling it quits&apos; and in fact implies the opposite. And if your defense is &quot;well, our reporting is not as bad as Billboard&apos;s reporting&quot;, you may want to raise your standards.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tankboy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592246</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592246</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:26:46 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Neither was poor reporting. TOC was working on info from a source and we were doing the same. As soon as Rusk broke his silence -- note he was asked for comment by TOC in the first place -- we posted the updated details.

I&apos;d also like to point out that we credited the sources of our info, and posted correct information as it became available, a protocol seemingly abandoned by 90% of the other sites discussing this story ... and I am personally flabbergasted at sites that posted Rusk&apos;s statement and then still went on to report the label was shutting down!

It&apos;s also worth noting that Billboard is quoting sources within the company offering a different take on the reality of the situation than Rusk&apos;s statement would imply: http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i81e87508e923955f9924f3c08c6a79d2&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>AnotherMark</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592236</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592236</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:18:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&apos;t decide which is worse reporting... Timeout for publishing half truths and fiction or Chicagoist for retelling those half truths and fiction. Come on guys and girls! HOLY CRAP, there is a world of information a freaking phone call or email message away... DO A LITTLE TINY BIT OF WORK TO GET THE STORY RIGHT BEFORE YOU POST! Otherwise you are just as dumb as a game of telephone...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>hotwater30</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592000</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1592000</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:56:01 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Sad news for Chicago and the music community at large. Touch and Go has released/distributed a large part of my record collection dating back to my high school days in the late 80&apos;s. I am truly bummed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ccbayer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1591691</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/02/18/touch_go_on_its_way_out.php#comment-1591691</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:33:24 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;negative approach + necros&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
