<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Quinn Backs Off Of Burris</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/02/quinn_backs_off_of_burris.php</link>
<description>All comments for Quinn Backs Off Of Burris</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>JAWilson</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/02/quinn_backs_off_of_burris.php#comment-1602495</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/02/quinn_backs_off_of_burris.php#comment-1602495</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:01:31 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;IMHO, the race card has trumped Quinn&apos;s reformer label.  If Quinn converts to just another Illinois politician, he&apos;ll be a weak candidate the next election.  I&apos;m disappointed in Quinn for this backflip.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Speedster</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/02/quinn_backs_off_of_burris.php#comment-1602232</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/02/quinn_backs_off_of_burris.php#comment-1602232</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:03:03 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Well being that there&apos;s only 2 senator positions for the state, (with one senator election at a time) you HAVE to base merit over diversity. You try and do the opposite, and you&apos;re going to piss off other minorities.

The House of Representatives is more able to reflect diversity, being that they represent (19) different districts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Marcus Gilmer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/02/quinn_backs_off_of_burris.php#comment-1602207</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/02/quinn_backs_off_of_burris.php#comment-1602207</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:43:58 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There was the same issue when Rep. Rush called for a black replacement before Burris was appointed. How do you weigh the need for diversity against merit? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Speedster</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/02/quinn_backs_off_of_burris.php#comment-1602201</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/02/quinn_backs_off_of_burris.php#comment-1602201</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:37:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;While I&apos;m not crazy about Sen. Burris, being that I am not sure he holds the interests of the people of Illinois as he is on holding high public offices, I&apos;m not less interested in wasting taxpayer dollars for a special election for the 2 remaining years in office. I&apos;m just crossing my fingers and hoping that we can coast to a better candidate in the 2010 election. If he does make some great changes for this state, well it&apos;s an unexpected benefit, but I&apos;m not holding my breath.

As far as the quote from Ald. Burnett, &quot;Burris&apos; Senate seat is really bigger than Burris as far as race goes, because he&apos;s the only African-American Senator in the United States of America. So this is a big deal to the African-American community.&quot; I think anybody who reads past political headlines knows he&apos;s the only black senator out there right now, but that quote really, NO I MEAN REALLY, seems like affirmative action puts Sen. Burris in the office. I know that&apos;s not what you mean, but please don&apos;t defend his right to be there by saying - despite all the questionable ethics of his appointment, that he deserves to be there simply because of race, and not merit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
