<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Burris Survives Removal Attempt, To Face A Daley in 2010</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/06/burris_survives_removal_attempt_to.php</link>
<description>All comments for Burris Survives Removal Attempt, To Face A Daley in 2010</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 chicagoist_rob</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>randomcha@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>randomcha@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>PhotoshopAbuser</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/06/burris_survives_removal_attempt_to.php#comment-1605888</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/06/burris_survives_removal_attempt_to.php#comment-1605888</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:04:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Are the numbers really there with black church community activists? I&apos;m just wondering. It seems like lately they have gone the way of Jesse Jackson. Always looking for a sound byte but other than the threat of a boycott, little else. I&apos;m not that familiar with Chicago voting patterns and am intrigued by the way these politicians fold like a house of cards when some pastor from the church of Our Lady of Perpetual Back Pain threatens a politician or a business.

That being said, I&apos;m glad the burris thing is over for now. He will see what the voters think of him soon enough. I&apos;m sure he already knows how the Senate feels about him. 

Perhaps his headstone should read...&quot;Could Never Win a Primary So I Got Myself Appointed Instead&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spook</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/06/burris_survives_removal_attempt_to.php#comment-1605770</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/06/burris_survives_removal_attempt_to.php#comment-1605770</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:42:01 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I wish we could band &quot;religion&quot; in the Black Community, the strength of the Black church is, well unholey and almost as corrupt as Daley&apos;s Machine. Lisa Madigan was also was threatend by those poverty pimp&apos;n ministers!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>oz115</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/06/burris_survives_removal_attempt_to.php#comment-1605750</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/06/burris_survives_removal_attempt_to.php#comment-1605750</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:20:46 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Honestly... This Burris business has gone on too long. The special election is a nice idea, but the $50,000,000 (!!) cost is stupid, and can be used for something better. It&apos;s not like Burris can cause any real damage. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>BlueFairlane</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/06/burris_survives_removal_attempt_to.php#comment-1605708</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/03/06/burris_survives_removal_attempt_to.php#comment-1605708</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:42:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm ... I had Daley as my pick in the next governor pool. I find a senate move more surprising.

I&apos;m actually glad to see this talk of special election go away, as it seems absurd to spend upwards of $50 million to decide who gets to hold an already occupied office for what would amount to a little over a year, most of which would be spent campaigning for re-election. Burris is as crooked as an Alaskan river, sure, but we can look forward to our nonspecial election next year.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
