AP Photo/M. Spencer Green
But with the state already $9 billion in the hole, Quinn hasn't been very forthcoming about where this money will come from. It seems the dreaded "t" word might be the answer. While Quinn is kinda/sorta opposed to a new gas tax, he has previously mentioned raising the state income tax. Added the governor:
“I think if you’re going to use any revenues to try to invest in our future in Illinois, in job creation, in making sure we get our economy moving, you should rely on taxes that are based on ability to pay,” Quinn said. “That’s my philosophy, you’ll hear about it next week. We’re going to have, I think, a very robust program in Illinois of job creation, investing in things that matter today, but also matter for our kids and grandkids.”



circle line! circle line!
If even half the money will actually go to our schools and infrastructure (with a priority on bringing rail into the 21st century), than I would gladly cede a larger portion of my income to the state. Ignoring the future of Illinois for the sake of no-tax populism will only put us at a disadvantage against our coastal neighbors. And no, Texas is not a proper model of laissez faire policy when you consider it's legacy of big federal funding and unsustainable urban sprawl.
Agreed. I'll pay more in taxes if it means that we actually get something for them.
If even half the money will actually go to our schools and infrastructure (with a priority on bringing rail into the 21st century), than I would gladly cede a larger portion of my income to the state. Ignoring the future of Illinois for the sake of no-tax populism will only put us at a disadvantage against our coastal neighbors. And no, Texas is not a proper model of laissez faire policy when you consider it's legacy of big federal funding and unsustainable urban sprawl.