<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: CTA Buys 58 Hybrid Buses with Stimulus Money</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php</link>
<description>All comments for CTA Buys 58 Hybrid Buses with Stimulus Money</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 chicagoist_chuck</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:43:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>sudude6669@sbcglobal.net</managingEditor>
<webMaster>sudude6669@sbcglobal.net</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Von Erich</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635256</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635256</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:33:44 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What about these: http://www.chicagobus.org/bus/500
Bought for $140K a piece 4 years ago.  I&apos;ve seen these on the street.  Seem a lot more practical.  Sure they might hold less people, but put them on routes that don&apos;t usually have people pressed against the glass between 7-9am and 5-7pm.
Oh well.  It&apos;s kicking a dead horse.  I&apos;ll look forward to $3 fares by Xmas.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>pucca</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635065</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635065</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:51:29 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the current buses only have an mpg of 2. Most of the CTA&apos;s current fleet dates back to the mid 80s, so paying for themselves in 21 years seems doable, if not ideal. I couldn&apos;t find pricing information on the New Flyer website for diesel articulated buses, so it&apos;s hard to say how much more the city is paying for the hybrids, but that&apos;s where the price comparison should be - we really do need a younger fleet that won&apos;t break down so regularly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JessNevins</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635024</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635024</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:46:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Heh. I always loved that scene. 

Hell, why not just make repairs on the current generation of buses and wait 5-10 years until electric lithium ion fleet vehicles come online? The cost savings on those won&apos;t take 20 years and the pollution reduction is dramatic. 

It&apos;s not that we don&apos;t have enough buses. Never has been. The CTA can&apos;t field enough drivers on the routes. That&apos;s only going to get worse as you go from 4-5 workers paying for one retireee to 2.5 or even 2 paying for one. 

All those early retirements in the past few years as &quot;cost cutting&quot;? 

The baby boomers are going to bankrupt every pension plan in the next decade. And they&apos;re gonna live another 20+ years on average.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Von Erich</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635010</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635010</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:12:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I see your point.  But at least the numbers on the back of a package that says &quot;Diet&quot; reflect an actual change.  This sales pitch to the public is remeniscent of Vanilla Sky when they were trying to convince him that his facial prostethic was not a mask.

Take a look at New Flyer&apos;s website.  Want something hybrid?  Something people will notice a difference with?  Look at the electric buses.  San Francisco&apos;s BART has these.  Sure we&apos;ll have wires everywhere, but we do already and it&apos;s better than 3.7 MPG.

CTA pension, that&apos;s another.  This entity suffered from irrepairable damage before the pension recipients even started for the CTA.    &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JessNevins</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635006</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635006</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:36:15 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s textbook &quot;greenwashing&quot;. 

No different than slapping &quot;Diet&quot; or &quot;50% less fat&quot; on some fast food to make people think it&apos;s healthy.

The CTA pension is about to explode and make the &quot;doomsday budgets&quot; look like a dip in the money bin. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Von Erich</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635001</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/11/cta_buys_58_hybrid_buses_with_stimu.php#comment-1635001</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:41:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So...each bus run nearly $850,000?  And each bus will save almost $40,000 a year in maintenance costs?  And this will take 21 years to recoup the cost?  And 3.7 MPG is a hybrid?  That&apos;s some bad economics.  Who&apos;s cousin works for New Flyer?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
