<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Up Next in Tax Hikes: Soda?</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php</link>
<description>All comments for Up Next in Tax Hikes: Soda?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Prescott Carlson</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:45:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>gochicago.guide@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>gochicago.guide@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Natalia1979</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643341</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643341</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:17:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Ooohh, a burrito tax? I would have to march against that one...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>danoct</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643337</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643337</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:15:06 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What about fast food tax, frozen dinner tax, potato chip tax, candy tax, cooking oil tax, ground beef tax, frozen burrito tax, frozen pizza tax, anything that &quot;isn&apos;t healthy&quot; tax........................................................

Oh wait, doesn&apos;t the states poorest already qualify for free dental insurance!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lamgray</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643267</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643267</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:30:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I heard diet soda wasn&apos;t included b/c of its lack of sugar.  I think its absurd. . .if you&apos;re going to do this, only fair to tax every product with sugar in it.  So, if you add sugar to your starbucks, it should apply.

As an avid soda drinker. . this is DUMB. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Natalia1979</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643239</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643239</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:16:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, according to NPR, some dentists are seeing more business as people are grinding their teeth at night because of stress and anxiety. I guess more people need mouth guards and some are cracking their teeth. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Marcus Gilmer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643224</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643224</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:05:20 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;regional phrases. ugh. I grew up referring to all of it as &quot;Coke.&quot; I&apos;ve heard pop, soda, soda pop, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>xlprq</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643187</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643187</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:39:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So this is just a tax on soda? Does that mean pop is still untaxed? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tower18</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643125</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643125</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:10:59 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So with this tax, in Chicago, soda would be taxed at a rate of like 18%?  No thanks.  Sorry dentists.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sears Tower</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643073</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2009/04/22/up_next_in_taxes_soda.php#comment-1643073</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:41:56 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;How about we add a 5% tax on income of dentists who think their knowledge of teeth/gums entitles them to be considered experts on taxation?  We can use the proceeds to help people who work in the beverage industry become more efficient, as they won&apos;t be losing their jobs due to yet another anti-jobs tax in Illinois.

Besides, wouldn&apos;t dentists want people to have bad teeth, thereby giving them additional patients and income?  Economic downturns are terrible for dentists, as dental work becomes a luxury item when budgets have to be cut.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
