Drew's Jailhouse Interview

Never one to go more than a few days without telling the media what he thinks, Drew Peterson gave a jailhouse interview with NBC's Today Show that, once again, proclaimed his innocence.

Meanwhile, the Tribune is reporting this morning that Peterson was on the verge of losing hundreds of thousands of dollars in his divorce from third wife Kathleen Savio, whose murder Peterson was charged with last week. Instead, Drew kept everything upon her death.

After Savio drowned, Peterson submitted a handwritten will signed by him and Savio specifying that in death all assets would go to the surviving spouse and appointing Peterson's uncle James Carroll as executor. All proceeds from Savio's estate -- valued at up to $288,000, according to court documents -- were handed to Peterson.

A court-appointed public estate administrator later wrote that Carroll's actions "were not in the best interests of the Estate or its beneficiaries," and noted that almost all of Savio's personal belongings had been removed from the home prior to the administrator's appointment in April, one month after her death.

Peterson's attorney Joel Brodsky dismissed suggestions that the divorce was any motivation for Drew. "That's a very weak motive because half the people in America get divorced. So that means almost half the people in America have motive to commit murder. It's not the strongest motive you're ever going to come up with."

Email This Entry


Comments (7) [rss]

He's still the same arrogant schmuck, but I am sensing the beginnings of a bit of a chink in the armor.
And to Joel Brodsky: half the people in America may get divorced, but half the people in America don't have two dead wives behind them either.

textbook flawed logic by brodsky: if A then B, thus if B then A. a third-grader wouldn't buy it.

maybe someone should let brodsky know that we all know that relationship issues and money are common and likely motives for murder and that most people who are murdered are killed by someone they know

god what a ccksckr. you have to hand it to him for putting all those layers of contingency in place: whack her and cover it up, AND the bllsht will AND his own executor AND clean the place out first. obviously it turned out to be too problematic in practice so stacy went into a barrel, nice and neat.

It's still merely circumstantial suggestion of motive, and a weak one at that. It's not nearly enough to justify a conviction.

I am increasingly worried about the flimsiness of the prosecution in this case. I'm hoping there's plenty of evidence we haven't seen.

I wish the media would quit giving this a-hole airtime.

Money is never a motive for murder.

Joel Brodsky: Clown at law

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Chicagoist

Chicagoist is a website about Chicago. More

Editor: Marcus Gilmer
Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

where is the chicagoist facebook fan page?
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Chicagoist.

All Our RSS