Chicago's journalism elite gathered together Thursday afternoon for yet another group therapy session, this time bringing Carl Bernstein and our beloved editor-in-chief, Marcus Gilmer, into the mix. Covering a sweeping range of topics, the central theme was the future of the news industry. Conclusion? Doom. Oh, and there's no agreeing on life-saving measures. It wasn't that we didn't have the most brilliant minds of the old guard in the conference room at the Newberry Library for the IFC's Make Media Matter series - Bernstein was joined by editors Gerould Kern (Chicago Tribune), Donald Hayner (Chicago Sun-Times), Tran Ha (RedEye) WBBM-TV news director Jeff Kiernan, columnist/editor/host Carol Marin and WVON's Cliff Kelley - it's just that the old guard doesn't know what's going to happen and the new guard, represented only by Marcus and Ha, can't predict the future of their industry.
The panel was introduced by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, who said that the newspaper industry has as much to dislike about online classified site Craigslist as she does, albeit for different, perhaps less principled, reasons. But, she said, the media plays an integral role in policing the government and encouraging transparency. "As newsroom resources are dwindling, the public's need for news and info has never been greater," she said. "The role of news media as public watchdog has grown."
Madigan said her office is encouraging the growth of government transparency (sunshine) laws in this state, and applauded the efforts of a variety of publications, including the Chicago Tribune. "The public expects the government to put in policies that are essential to restoring trust... I'm putting considerable effort into increasing sunshine."
Kern, commenting later in the panel, said he thought one of the most poignant examples of the problems plaguing the industry was the day his staff at the Tribune published the story about former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich's arrest. It was the same day the newspaper published a story about its parent company filing for bankruptcy. Kern said that though his paper, and Chicago's other major daily are failing, they're attempting to restructure to suit the new news environment. "That was the day we said 'The business model is broken,'" said Kern. "We asked, 'How do we build an organization that will match the needs of today?'" Kern said that despite five rounds of layoffs, his paper has hired people in different arenas, and moved resources around internally. "We have more people in the metro section than we did that day," he said. "We've created new departments, we've moved people in, and we've made consumer issues and government watchdog work a keystone of our reporting... We think that solution builds on fundamentals we think are key today... We're a multi-platform organization now."
Don Hayner, whose newspaper is also bankrupt, has cut staff back to about 170 people in the newsroom. He said he thinks traditional newspapers may stay around, but that they might have to look at their product in a different way for funding, "You have to have the product paid for - and that might be the solution," he said. "We were so reliant on an ad-heavy versus product-heavy [revenue model]." He also suggested either pushing up the costs of actual newspapers, or creating a partnership between several news outlets to provide a support system for reporters who challenge government officials. "The nature of the business is a bunch of independent businesses, all playing a collective game of chicken about charging for content," he said. "Freedom isn't free. News isn't free. It takes power."
Bernstein, whose work on Watergate still sends shivers down the spines of most young journalists, said that the reporting game is best left to young people, and that the focus on the publishing mechanism is a distraction. "Most important thing a reporter does is to decide "what is news." It's a tricky function," he said. "There's a huge danger that as we move towards this new model, [we're going to lose that.]"
"I hate the word content... Almost anything qualifies as content," added Marin. "But news is 'Wow, I didn't know that was going on in my city hall.'"
For more details from the forum, check out the live tweets posted here and WBEZ's audio from the event. For more about the Make Media Matter series, visit the IFC's media project.

House Preps Health Care Vote



L. Madigan does a good PR job when it comes to Freedom of Information, but I'm skeptical she really will champion reform that helps citizens more than politicians.
And it's cute that the RedEye person is considered a real journalist.
Marcus looks extremely flummoxed in that shot. Doesn't give me a lot of confidence in the future of new media.
I kid because I love. :-)
What's going to happen to journalism? It's going to become much more centralized with a few firms dissiminating large pieces of information to distributors such as google (online) and, if they still exist, smaller local newspapers in local markets.
Newspapers will need to understand that they are not the contentn distributors but the content CREATORS. If they cannot generate the content, distributors such as google will crush them. It is up to the newspaper providers to find out what role they play in generating this content.
The AP, UP, Reuters, the NYTimes and - in some cases - the Trib (though I don't see the need for an international Tribune desk that is already covered by the previous three) are generating this content for syndication nationwide. The Suntimes, Boston Globe, Miami Herald are not.
The large firms will stay in business. The others will not.
As for print, I see it becoming if not dead closer to the Red Eye format with World and National coverage syndicated by the above content providers. Local news will dominate mostly in PR related formats such as entertainment.
As for online content, the above providers need to do a better job of working with Google, who dissiminates their content for free, by getting a larger share of its ad revenues. If they work in unison and tell Google that it is bleeding them dry without a proper profit sharing program, then they should be able to generate their content.
Everything else, I believe, will be built around this model. Smaller newspapers will have what essentially amounts to an RSS feed from the large content generators and will build a newspaper around it - providing local news, entertainment, lifestyle, etc...
With new products like Adobe Air, newspapers can be delivered to computers in a print (not online) format avoiding the need to print alltogether.
I don't see the newspaper dying so much as evolving. But it had better do it soon or it will be in as much trouble as the music industry was when mp3s hit the market.
Wow. I can't believe I wrote that.