Friday Flashback: Milk!

somerefreshingmilkperhaps060509.jpg We've been loving poking around the annals of Chicago's past via LexisNexis and enjoying seeing what goes on through the lens of history. Just for shits and giggles, we plugged in today's date from a hundred years back to see what the headline from a century-old news cycle. The hot topic from back then: Should Chicago require that milk be pasteurized?

From a story headlined "Cook Milk? Many Fight It" in the Chicago Tribune, June 5, 1909:

Representatives of the butter and cheese trades yesterday joined with the milk dealers in protesting against the requirement of the pasteurization of milk from cows not scientifically proved free from tuberculosis.

In a two hour session before the health department committee in the counic chamber - which was crowded with milkmen - arguments that the cooking process destroys food values, that it prevents the manufacture of butter and cheese, and that it was not a guarantee of purity, that the enforcement of the requirement is impossible, and that its enactment as a law would hurt local industries were hurled at the ordinance.

Throughout it all, Health Commissioner W.A. Evans smiled, and when speakers had concluded, gently extracted from them admissions that pasteurization is a necessary expedient until the tuberculin test of cows can be enforced generally.

This proves three things: that lobbyists have always had a voice in politics, that slow news days are nothing new, and further proof that Chicago fooling with rules about food extend far before the foie gras wars. Other headlines from June 5th, 1909: "Airship Station Opens Today!" If only they had cable news back then - and what a marvelous richness of hilarity we'll have a hundred years from now.

"Some Refreshing Milk, Perhaps?" by pantagrapher.

Email This Entry


Comments (7) [rss]

Some still say 'raw' milk should be legal.

http://bitten.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/27/the-quest-for-raw-milk/?scp=4&sq=raw%20milk&st=cse

that slow news days are nothing new,

Well, I don't know if I would call this type of article a "slow news day" article in 1909. I mean, diseases were much more rampant. Typhoid, small pox, scarlet fever, whooping cough all were pretty much regular things then, not to mention tuberculosis. I think this debate was pretty significant for then. Being free from those diseases is something we take for granted now. When's the last time you worried about getting rickets? :)

Cubs fans are always worried about getting Rickets.

:-)

This is the best thread hijacking ever. From 1909 milk to ragging on a Cubs pitcher. Classic!

I also wouldn't have considered this a slow news day item. I wrote a post about it a while ago that you can read here: http://poise.cc/blog/2003/01/16/got-milk-got-tb

Essentially tb was the cause of many children dying, farmers were unwilling to make sure their herds were tb-free, and transporting milk while cold was expensive and rare. But we can be proud that Chicago was the first city to pass this legislation and rates of infant mortality dropped by 2/3 after pasteurization was required.

Pasteurization also drastically increases the shelf life of milk so many places were pasteurizing anyway and just not telling people because they knew pasteurization changed the flavor of milk.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Chicagoist

Chicagoist is a website about Chicago. More

Editor: Marcus Gilmer
Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

NYT article detailing how the city will spend all of the money from the parking meter lease by 2010.
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Chicagoist.

All Our RSS