AP Photo/Nam Huh
"You don't want to be a poor loser, (but) what you have to do is evaluate whether the U.S. (cities) can bid against Japan and Spain and Russia," he said. "How do you bid against $150 million?" He was speaking of government money -- money that can be used to fly officials around the world, produce ads and otherwise promote an Olympics bid.
All of the money that Chicago 2016 spent on its bid - estimated to be around $70 million - was raised from private sources while the only federal support the city was promised pertained to transit improvements and security. Said MayDay, "You have to rethink whether the U.S. should ever bid." Sources speaking to Crain's Greg Hinz seemed split: one source agreed with Daley's assessment and suggested the U.S. should stick to bidding on Winter Olympics only while another source disagreed and implied that the problem could be solved with an overhaul of the USOC.



I bet that $70 million could have done wonders for some of the other issues affecting Chicago. I can appreciate what the Olympics would have done for the local economy, but $70 million is a huge wager.
Chicago Web Design
CWD- That money was private funds raised for the bid. It would not have existed for the govt to spend on other causes. It was a wager on the part of the private financiers. The city was gambling too, but not with the bid money. It's gamble would have occurred if we won the bid.
Daley has a point here. Municipal & state govts really don't have the means it takes to woo the IOC the way a federal govt does. Other nations put the whole country into the effort. Without that kind of support, American Olympic bids will have a hard time in this day and age.
This is not to say the US will never have the Olympics again. It will just take the right confluence of variables. But then again I guess that's how it has always worked.
But Mayor Daley won't let the dream die-- he's still going to bulldoze Michael Reese, even if there's nothing to put there. Leave no campaign contributor behind!