Quantcast

600+ City Employees to be Laid Off

2011_1_7_rahm.jpg
AP Photo/M. Spencer Green
Mayor Emanuel gave unions until yesterday to come up with a solution to help solve the $31 million city budget deficit or else face layoffs. Labor organizations were unable to, and it looks like more than 600 city employees will be seeing pink slips.

Although the news of layoffs isn't exactly welcome and heartwarming, Mayor Emanuel did list a few ways the city will be addressing the deficit:

The Mayor said the city will no longer be responsible for the custodial services at libraries and at the airports, managing benefits, and staffing the water billing call center. He also said he'll cut the seasonal work force at the Department of Transportation by 75%.

The Mayor says these moves will save $10 million. He announced recently he saved the other $20 million by making changes to the city's health care community clinics, and by not filling up to 200 open positions.

While labor organizations feel that Mayor Emanuel didn't give them enough time to respond with a resolution, Mayor Emanuel doesn't really agree with that sentiment:

"It has been two weeks and despite ongoing talks between leaders of organized labor and my administration, none of the changes yet have been embraced or agreed upon," Emanuel said. "My duty as mayor is to protect our city's taxpayers ... not to protect the city's payroll."

Should Mayor Emanuel have been more patient with labor organizations to reach an amicable end-point to resolving the $31 million shortfall? It does seem that two weeks is a relatively short time, but we understand that time is of the essence with money matters here in Chicago. Whatever the reasoning is, Mayor Emanuel is pretty serious about solving the city's budget issue.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@chicagoist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Navin_Johnson

    Workers pay for Emmanuel's buddy's misdeeds.  Business as usual among the scumbag elite business class.

  • It does seem that two weeks is a relatively short time ...

    While the current two-week timeline is new, the budget woes aren't. Everybody, from administration to labor, knew this was coming for a long, long while. If anybody wanted to come up with an alternative suggestion, they had plenty of time to do it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@chicagoist.com