Quantcast

Ditka Would Spit on Payton Bio Author

Jeff Pearlman's biography of Walter Payton is rapidly becoming an indictment on established journalists in Chicago than it is one against Pearlman. At least that's what we're divining from the tea leaves.

Here's John Kass' latest attempt to establish his blue collar credentials.

"So what do you think?" my friend Deuce asked me.

I think that's just about the most awful writing I've ever seen outside a 12-step Rod McKuen program.

If I ever write like that, you have my permission to approach me quietly from behind and club me in the back of the head with a blunt object, repeatedly, until I lie quite still. That way my editor can get in a few thwacks too.

Where does the line start?

Pearlman was interviewed by WSCR-AM morning hosts Mike Mulligan and Brian Hanley. Both of them parroted the "why did you write the book" narrative while admitting they knew of Payton's issues Pearlman writes about. Mully and Hanley's position, one we assume is shared by other local sportswriters, is that what was buried should stay buried and Pearlman broke some sort of local sportswriter omerta of which he was unaware.

Then there's NBC Chicago, which was the first with a camera and microphone to interview Mike Ditka at his restaurant about Pearlman's book. Ditka responded with what we're absolutely certain is a health code violation.

View more videos at: http://nbcchicago.com.

The photo we here at Chicagoist are mandated to run every time a post involves Mike Ditka makes us wonder how a bio of "Da Coach" would read.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@chicagoist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Mimihaha

    Does everyone realize the SI excerpt is all anyone has read of the book? That's 20 pages out of 200 something pages. I'm guessing SI excerpted the worst stuff, and the other 180+ pages is about what a great guy Payton was, in spite of the pain and the meds and the rest.

    And I'd spit on Mike Ditka if he came anywhere near me, but that's just me. YMMV.

  • The problems I have with this book are no more severe than the problems I have with virtually any other celebrity biography ... or, for that matter, with supermarket tabloids. I don't have this purient interest in the dark sides of famous people. And I'm sure that even those I most admire have dark sides, I have no need to hear about it. It doesn't affect my life any more than a biography about Michael Vick or Babe Ruth or that Snooky person. Some guy wrote a book about a football player. Who cares?

    I can understand the reaction of Chicago sports media, though, as to many of them this book isn't just about a football player. It's about a guy they knew, and in many cases a guy they considered a friend, a guy they loved. What's worse, it's senseless gossip akin to a Kitty Kelley slam about a friend who died too young and can't defend himself or put any of it in context or explain his side of it. Were it your friend, Chuck, I suspect you'd feel much the same way.

  • Chuck_Sudo

    Probably. But if it were a friend of mine who did these things (as Mulligan and Hanley admitted in their interview with Pearlman this morning) I would hope I could be rational enough to admit it and have the thick skin to take my lumps.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@chicagoist.com