Quantcast

Indiana Wants To Keep Cursive Handwriting On The Curriculum

2011_12_01_cursive.jpg
iofoto/shutterstock
Earlier this year the Indiana Department of Education decided to remove cursive handwriting from the state's curriculum, but now some lawmakers want to make it mandatory instead. Two lawmakers said they plan to submit bills when they reconvene in 2012.

The education department's directive doesn't ban the teaching of cursive handwriting in class, and many teachers say they're still using it. NWI Times writes:

"We haven't totally dropped the concept," (Jim Rice, superintendent of River Forest Community School Corp.) said. "Teachers touch on cursive writing. We're not buying the handbooks like we used to, but we are still emphasizing the techniques. We also are not directly teaching keyboarding. But as teachers are showing students how to use computers, we are working on keyboarding skills."

Is cursive really necessary in the digital age? We remember cursive as the hardest subject to tackle in elementary school, and we learned more than we cared to know about the letter C on our report cards. Aside from learning the shame of crummy penmanship, apparently we were also developing motor skills "being able to write easily allows children in later elementary grades to focus on the content of their narratives."

We keep wondering one thing, though: If an entire generation grows up without learning cursive, how will they sign their name? Granted most people make a half-assed scribbled attempt at a signature as it is, but surely the digital age will still require a fair amount of paperwork.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@chicagoist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Brian Morrison

    Cursive is not really... necessary. I believe in writing and developing handwriting and using your hands to make things on paper. But I have not used cursive since I left grade school and my signature has always been "print". It's still me, it's still a signature. And hey— it's a signature that you can read!

    Being into design and learning to create typefaces and being into calligraphy, those are all cool and disciplined things, but not so necessary for your average person.

  • Melissa Ferguson

    Not to mention, learning to write in cursive is really instrumental in/beneficial to fine motor development. 

  • As a designer, this really makes me cringe. Script typography is abundant in our society. To not read cursive is to not be literate. Period. Imagine the formal invitations, restaurant logos, perfume bottles all rendered in an antiquated typeface. Since when do we campaign to stop teaching the written English language?

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@chicagoist.com