Quantcast

Finally: Ron Santo Elected to Baseball Hall of Fame

2011_12_5_santo.jpg
Image Credit: Chris Reilmann

During his life Ron Santo openly pined to be inducted into Baseball's Hall of Fame and he couldn't mask his disappointment whenever sportswriters and, later, the Veterans Committee denied him entry year after year.

All of this makes Santo's election to the Hall this morning all the more bittersweet, in addition to being overdue. Santo was the only player elected, receiving 15 of 16 votes in the "Golden Era" balloting, which encompasses the years 1947-72.

Santo's election to the hall comes just over a year after his passing. Some, including this writer, long believed Santo's open campaigning for the Hall was a major reason he was denied enshrinement in Cooperstown when he was alive. Santo even admitted as much to the Daily Herald's Barry Rosner ten years ago.

“I can't explain that feeling,” Santo told me in August 2001. “It's something that fills you up and completes your career. I've always said I wouldn't want it to happen if I was dead, so I hope I live that long.”

But his stats were worthy of the Hall: with .277 with 342 home runs and 1,331 RBIs, nine All-Star appearances and five consecutive Gold Gloves, Santo had numbers comparable to Orioles Hall of Fame third baseman Brooks Robinson, to whom he was often compared.

Santo becomes the 47th Hall of Famer to have played for the Cubs and joins Ernie Banks, Billy Williams and Fergie Jenkins from the ill-fated 1969 team to make the Hall.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@chicagoist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Mimihaha

    He never really had the numbers to make it into the Hall.

  • mike_thoms

    You obviously have no baseball knowledge whatsoever. You're out of your element Donnie.

  • ChicagoD

    Come on now. Sure he did. Compared to his era he deserved it. Compared to the steroid monsters not so much.

    Personally I think he suffered because too many '69-era Cubs were shoo-in Hall of Famers and there was a sense that a team that never won anything had too many as it was.

  • The numbers argument is irrelevant now, as entry into the Hall isn't an objective thing. The question for potential Hall of Famers is always "Are your numbers good enough to convince a bunch of people you belong here." The answer, once you're in, is indisputably yes, no matter how good or bad those numbers may be.

    I think Santo had other problems in addition to what you cite. I think a lot of people in baseball, especially uppity old-guard types, thought Santo was an ass, and I think a lot of these same people were turned off by the aggressive campaigning he'd do every time his name came up. I find the fact that he only managed to get in while dead telling.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@chicagoist.com