Quantcast

Parking Meter Company Bills City for Street Closures

2011_12_19_no_parking.jpg
Image Credit: Seth Anderson

Last week Chicago Parking Meters, LLC sent the City a bill for $13.5 million in revenues they lost from motorists with handicapped parking placards parking for free in metered spots. Today our friends at The Expired Meter report the company also sent the City a bill for an extra $2.1 million in what they call "true-up revenue" related to street closures.

Our analogy comparing the parking meter deal to herpes becomes even more apt.

The Expired Meter has copies of the billing statements here (pdf) that show Chicago Parking Meters, LLC billed the City $533,290 in true-up revenue for 2009 and $1,658,036 for 2010. The problem is: few at City Hall have an idea what defines "true-up revenue." 32nd Ward Ald. Scott Waguespack said:

“Don’t let anyone say it (the meter lease) doesn’t affect them because this (money owed to CPM) becomes part of the budget. We knew it was coming and we knew it was part of the contract but didn’t do anything to prevent it.”

Because it's written in the apparently iron-clad contract, Chicago Parking Meters can bill the City whenever they close streets, motorists with handicapped parking placards use metered spots, or in instances where the City has to remove a meter box from the system — e.g. to make room for a bus stop; install a loading zone; or closing a street for an event. Since we don't see many new bus stops or loading zones being installed, we're assuming CPM is billing for street closures.

Under the terms of the deal, CPM may bill the City whenever metered spots are closed for more than six hours in a day or for six total hours over three consecutive days, above the annual allowance cited in the contract.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@chicagoist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • off_leash

    I haven't looked at the contract, but wonder if Chicago Parking Meters, llc is paying for all metered parking enforcement. If the city isn't getting the revenue then taxpayers shouldn't be footing the enforcement bill.

  • earl hickey

    the City should refuse to pay this .  Make CPM take the city to court and force them to prove every dime of their claim.

  • Stealth2

    Make Daley pay it.

  • sat3911

    Wait, I just looked at some math.  $1.2 billion divided by 75 years is $16 million per year.  If they are clawing back $15 million per year right now, and rates go up at an unrealistically low 2% per year, that means in 75 years, the city will be owing them $66 million per year.  And that is in addition to the parking revenue.  That is a lot of juice.

  • Navin_Johnson

    Privatization, the gift that just keeps on giving.

  • earl hickey

    remember this was privatization done by a life long Democrat.

  • sat3911

    Maybe this will spur the city into not actually closing shit until they need to close it. 

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@chicagoist.com