Quantcast

Adbusters Promises 50,000 Protesters for NATO/G8 Summits

2012_1_27_adbusters.jpeg
Art by Adbusters

Adbusters, the Vancouver-based activist group who helped spark the Occupy movement, is calling for over 50,000 protesters to come to Chicago for the May NATO and G8 summits, and they're invoking the ghosts of Chicago history in the process.

In a "tactical briefing" on their website, Adbusters writes:

"(T)his time around we’re not going to put up with the kind of police repression that happened during the Democratic National Convention protests in Chicago, 1968 … nor will we abide by any phony restrictions the City of Chicago may want to impose on our first amendment rights. We’ll go there with our heads held high and assemble for a month-long people’s summit … we’ll march and chant and sing and shout and exercise our right to tell our elected representatives what we want … the constitution will be our guide.

"And when the G8 and NATO meet behind closed doors on May 19, we’ll be ready with our demands: a Robin Hood Tax … a ban on high frequency ‘flash’ trading … a binding climate change accord … a three strikes and you’re out law for corporate criminals … an all out initiative for a nuclear-free Middle East … whatever we decide in our general assemblies and in our global internet brainstorm - we the people will set the agenda for the next few years and demand our leaders carry it out.

"And if they don’t listen … if they ignore us and put our demands on the back burner like they’ve done so many times before … then, with Gandhian ferocity, we’ll flashmob the streets, shut down stock exchanges, campuses, corporate headquarters and cities across the globe … we’ll make the price of doing business as usual too much to bear."

Referencing the 1968 Democratic convention, at the very least, is intended to link opposition to the summits and the ongoing debate over protest restrictions passed by City Council for the summits to one of the low-water marks in Chicago history, if it isn't perceived by Chicago Police as a challenge to their authority.

Adbusters isn't the only group planning protests in the weeks before the Summits. Chicago Mass Action—a union of the Coalition Against the NATO/G8 Summits and Midwest Anti-War Mobilization—is planning marches May 19 and 20.

Even though City Council passed what opponents are now calling the "Sit Down and Shut Up" ordinance, protesters may have an unlikely ally in 22nd Ward Ald. Ricardo Munoz. Munoz is pushing for legislation at the next City Council meeting Feb. 15 that will prohibit Chicago Police from attempting to block access to social networking sites and cell phone networks during the summits. He's been asking for suggestions on his Twitter feed he hopes to add to the ordinance proposal.

Munoz, leader of the City Council Reform Caucus, voted for the summit security changes but said his goal is finding the right balance between internet security and free speech.

“This will be the first G8 summit on American soil in the Age of Twitter,” Munoz said. “Social media sites are more than information sharing tools; they are organizing tools. They are fundamental to our right to free speech and assembly. That’s why these sites are blocked in countries like China and why we must protect access to them here.”

Contact the author of this article or email tips@chicagoist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • tsol
    The 1968 Chicago protests helped Nixon get elected.
  • Navin_Johnson
    Cool, Nixon was practically left of Obama.
  • furytrader
    Let the freak show begin!
  • There will never be grass in Grant Park again.
  • Navin_Johnson
    Just wait until the next concert.
  • Well, that's just it, isn't it ... it takes four months to fix the park after Lollapalooza trashed it, and now 50,000 people think they're going to live there for a month, after which Lollapalooza will come trash it again. We might as well just pave the thing.
  • Navin_Johnson
    I was talkin' about "graaaaaaaaaasss" brah.

    But, anyway. If 50K humans travel to Chicago because of Adbusters I'll chip in for the resodding. According to what I just heard on the radio, they didn't even reach out to the local movements before making this "announcement".
  • Oh ... the joke's funny. Now I feel bad for missing it.
  • ChicagoD
    This is true. I had a localized movement this very morning and did not hear word one from Canada.
  • Tafter
    "And this time around we’re not going to put up with the kind of police
    repression that happened during the Democratic National Convention
    protests in Chicago, 1968 … nor will we abide by any phony restrictions
    the City of Chicago may want to impose on our first amendment rights.
    We’ll go there with our heads held high and assemble for a month-long
    people’s summit … we’ll march and chant and sing and shout and exercise
    our right to tell our elected representatives what we want … the
    constitution will be our guide."

    What complete, utter horseshit.  These ass clowns have no clue as to what the constitution actually grants them and what they limits of their rights might be.  It is all self-righteous rage and no common sense.

    They are going to make the average Chicagoan's life HELL for a month.
  • High_n_Dry
    A small percentage of the population will be inconvenienced by the protests. Granted if you work near the protesting locations it will be annoying but most people won't even be aware of the protests other than reading about it or watching it on TV.

    50k ain't gonna happen, if it does then it will be interesting to see how it all unfolds.
  • Navin_Johnson
    The biggest inconvenience will be from parades of "Dignitaries" traveling through the city.
  • Navin_Johnson
    Yesterday:  Pro tip:  posts that are 80% name calling are obvious attempts at trolling

    Today: What complete, utter horseshit.  These ass clowns have no clue as to what the constitution actually grants them and what they limits of their rights might be.  It is all self-righteous rage and no common sense.
  • ChicagoD
    Because I get the sense that you actually care about these sort of distinctions, keep in mind that lots of the Bill of Rights bars the government from violating inalienable rights. That is to say that nothing is "granted" by the Constitution. Certainly that is not true all all of the Constitution, but it is an important distinction to political philosophers. Which I am not one of.

    For what it's worth.
  • ChicagoD
    How are they going to block Twitter or Facebook? Even if they turn off wifi signals, are they really going to shut down the cellular signals in the Loop? The protesters will be the least of their problems if they do this. They ought to just follow on Twitter and friend on Facebook.

    P.S. What constitution will guide people from Vancouver? The Magna Carta?
  • Navin_Johnson
    Code of Hammurabi?
  • ChicagoD
    Now you're just being ridiculous (Winky the emoticon here).

    That being said, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C... does make me wonder exactly what acts of Parliament these Canadians intend to be guided by.
  • jfu222
    Do you disagree with the demands listed above or the means of protest?
  • Navin_Johnson
    He literally created his account 16 minutes ago..
  • jfu222
    Ah Navin .. I totally misunderstood and thought you wee referring to my account and not an account listed above
  • Clyde Shuman
    AdBusters is so completely full of shit and filled with its own sense of desitiny.  "Ghandian ferocity"!  I nearly died laughing.
  • twocee
    Oh.  Goodie.

    So, is the CPD really saying they are going to try and block Facebook and Twitter during the summit?  I don't know how that would even be possible.
  • aerojad
    ... sigh.
  • chicagoJAY
    "we’ll flashmob the streets, shut down stock exchanges, campuses, corporate headquarters "... Noooooo! Please, I am trying to work here. Please stay on the coasts. As far as these clowns go, I support the "Sit Down and Shut Up". Normal folks may gather, protest, etc.
blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@chicagoist.com