The controversial abortion law that requires doctors to notify a girl's parents or guardians before (if the girl is under the age of 17) before performing an abortion has hit another snag. A circuit court judge has decided to extend a current restraining order on the law through the end of the year. According to WBEZ, the judge, "says he's waiting for briefs from both sides before determining whether the law should stand." Though it was set to go into effect almost three weeks ago, the law, with an already tumultuous history dating as far back as 1984 (before being updated in '95), the law continues to be centered in a tug-of-war.
Results tagged “abortionnotificationlaw”
- On again, off again: the abortion notification law is on hold once more after a judge issued a restraining order on it this afternoon at the request of the ACLU.
- According to prosecutors, the man accused of causing a wreck that killed a pregnant mother and the baby - delivered by emergency c-section after the crash - had cocaine in his system at the time of the crash.
- Mick Dumke breaks down Mayor Daley's interview with WBEZ from earlier in the week.
The Illinois' Medical Disciplinary Board voted this morning to not extend the grace period set on the long-debated abortion notification law that was set to go into effect earlier this week, meaning the law was put into effect immediately. The law requires physicians to notify the parents/guardians of girls 17 years or younger who seek an abortion. [CBS 2]
The abortion notification law that was supposed to take effect tomorrow? It seems it won't start until at least Wednesday. Late Friday, The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation issued another extension on the law's injunction, in place until the state's Medical Disciplinary Board meets on Wednesday at which point they could impose another extension on the injunction or go ahead and call for it's enforcement. [CBS 2]
