Gun Charges Against Drew Peterson Dropped, Namesake Law Passes

By Marcus Gilmer in News on Nov 20, 2008 10:50PM

Gun charges against Drew Peterson stemming from a semi-automatic weapon police seized were dismissed this afternoon after prosecutors refused to cooperate with a judge's ruling. The judge had ruled that prosecutors had to turn over to the defense all documents they compiled before they arrested Peterson on the gun charge. Attorneys for Bolingbrook's Most Notorious Ex-Husband™ claim the charge was a case of vindictiveness. So it looks like we will be prevented from seeing the awesomeness of John Travolta testifying on behalf of Drew.

Not that it was all good news for Peterson today. The law allowing hearsay to be admitted in murder trials, dubbed "The Drew Peterson Law" was passed last night by the Illinois House after previously being passed by the Senate.

Will County State's Atty. James Glasgow, who's sought the law for months, said, "This is a bill that will help prosecutors across the state to utilize the statements made by murder victims . . . that previously would have died with them."

Glasgow declined to comment on whether the law directly pertains to the Peterson case, but did say that he would "use it aggressively wherever it applies."

The House voted 109-0 on the bill, which allows hearsay evidence into court in first-degree murder cases if the prosecution can prove to the judge at a pretrial hearing that there is a preponderance of evidence the defendant killed a witness to prevent his or her testimony. The House vote followed Senate approval a week before.

Essentially, Drew's "current" wife - for now, anyway - Stacy apparently told her priest that Drew admitted to her that he killed wife #3, Kathleen Savio. This is now potentially admissible in a court of law. As much as we loathe Drew, we this new law seems...we don't know...dangerous and illegal? Either way, Drew has yet to be charged with anything and is still free man as of today, so...yeah.