Eight Midwest States Apply for High-Speed Rail Funding
By Lindsey Miller in News on Sep 24, 2009 9:40PM
Photo by josephp
As always, opinions on the proposal span the spectrum. Some believe the route should support faster, 220-mph trains, like the California proposal, which would link San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, and San Diego (San Francisco to Los Angeles in less than 2.5 hours).
Some in Springfield don’t want the long talked about Chicago to St. Louis route to create more rail traffic through the already busy Third-St. corridor in Springfield. Craig Hinz at Crain’s Chicago Business says the current rail infrastructure between Chicago and St. Louis can’t sustain the traffic high-speed rail would bring, and the price to build a new track would increase the cost of the project significantly (from $500 million to $2.42 billion). And that’s not including the rest of the proposed lines.