Bowles, Chicago Mag Clash On Twitter
By Chuck Sudo in Food on Jul 21, 2010 8:25PM
Photo by Ian Merritt
Bowles expressed his frustration with Walker's recap via Twitter, apparently without the benefit of a deep breath or five.
"Three words of the day: FUCK CHICAGO MAGAZINE."
Chicago Mag's response was priceless: "Only if you buy us dinner first." Which led to another reply from Bowles here and a more contrite reply from Chicago magazine here.
Walker's odd decision to review the food at a media preview was overshadowed by Bowles's churlish response to the post and to others who felt he needed to take a step back and compose himself. Bowles is known to not take criticism lying down, to which we can personally attest. There's also the perception that complaining about the coverage of a scheduled media preview is a little more than gauche. But he's also one of the more media savvy chefs in the city. The old maxim, "Any press is good press" is both applied and tested here.
(Disclosure: In the interest of transparency I should point out that Stolpman and I both attended graham elliot's second anniversary dinner in May. Neither one of us reviewed the meal.)