The Chicagoist will be launching later but in the meantime please enjoy our archives.

Did Tax Advantages Prompt Aon Corporation's Move to London?

By Soyoung Kwak in News on Jan 15, 2012 8:00PM

rsz_2012_01_aonctr.jpg
Photo by corydalus
On Friday, Aon Corporation announced that it will be moving its headquarters to London, in order to be closer to "one of the key hubs of insurance and risk brokerage" in the world. It turns out that Aon Corp.'s desire to be closer to the London market is motivated by something else: tax incentives.

According to Crain's, Aon's move to London could possibly increase its earnings per share, among other perks:

In addition, the company will have access to $300 million in excess cash abroad that would be subject to U.S. taxes if it attempted to move that money to the Chicago-based parent's balance sheet. After the move, the company can obtain that cash without tax penalty and use it for share repurchases or other shareholder-friendly purposes.

The benefits don't stop there. Crain's also noted that there will be certain relocation benefits for executives who agree to relocate to London. Although Aon Corp. isn't directly saying that tax incentives were the main reason for moving to London, it believes that the move will allow them to keep pace and be as competitive as other insurance brokerage firms around the world:

Aon... said it will see "increasing future cash flows through a significant reduction in our global effective tax rate, due primarily to changes in the geographical distribution of income." Aon said it didn't have a figure on how much that "significant reduction" will be. "A reduction in our global tax rate over the long-term would allow Aon to remain competitive with certain global competitors," the publicly-traded company said.

Aon insists that Chicago will remain Aon's North American headquarters and that its relocation will not result in job losses in Chicago. Aon states that it will add jobs to the Chicago market, and that Chicago will not have anything to worry about. The real question here is, do we believe them?